2020
DOI: 10.3390/civileng1030021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Concrete Material Properties at Early Age

Abstract: This article investigates the development of the following material properties of concrete with time: compressive strength, tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and fracture energy. These properties were determined at seven different hydration ages (18 h, 30 h, 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days) for four pure cement concrete mixes totaling 336 specimens tested throughout the study. Experimental data obtained were used to assess the relationship of the above properties with the concrete compressive stren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the standard deviations and coefficients of variation (COV) show a relatively narrow spreading of the results around the median, with higher accuracies for Mix 2 and Mix 3. Similar values for the two statistical terms were reported in the scientific literature for the hardened properties of concrete and their variation with age [19].…”
Section: Static Modulus Of Elasticitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The values of the standard deviations and coefficients of variation (COV) show a relatively narrow spreading of the results around the median, with higher accuracies for Mix 2 and Mix 3. Similar values for the two statistical terms were reported in the scientific literature for the hardened properties of concrete and their variation with age [19].…”
Section: Static Modulus Of Elasticitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results provided in [35] for predicting the development of mechanical features (elasticity modulus, compressive strength, etc.) in conventional concrete over a specific time span show that fib Model Code 2010 [36] has lower derivation from the experimental results than other standards.…”
Section: Tensile Strength Stress Causing First Crack Appearance and U...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the tensile strength is around 3 MPa [36] for specimens manufactured from normal concrete and around 8 MPa [37] for those manufactured from ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), it is evident that the tensile strength of CSFRC is about 400% higher than that of normal concrete and about 88% higher than that of UHPC. The results provided in [35] for predicting the development of mechanical features (elasticity modulus, compressive strength, etc.) in conventional concrete over a specific time span show that fib Model Code 2010 [36] has lower derivation from the experimental results than other standards.…”
Section: Tensile Strength Stress Causing First Crack Appearance and U...mentioning
confidence: 99%