2021
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.82.6.435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of computer-aided design software methods for assessment of the three-dimensional geometry of the canine radius

Abstract: D eformities of the radius are the most common bone deformities in dogs. 1 They generally result from premature closure of ulnar or radial physes, trauma, or genetically driven abnormal limb growth such as chondrodystrophy or chondrodysplasia. Radial deformities can be managed with surgical procedures such as corrective osteotomy and stabilization of the radius with a bone plate or external skeletal fixator. 1,2 Clinically, measurements of bone geometry are most commonly made on orthogonal (craniocaudal and me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study is limited by small group numbers, although the sample size was determined a priori using power analysis, and the sample size was sufficient to identify clear differences between dog groups for the number of calcified IVD. However, while the precision of CAD geometric analysis allows the detection of relatively minor geometric differences among bones without and with a deformity, 32 the small sample size increased the likelihood of type 2 statistical error, where numerical differences in vertebral geometry may not have been confirmed statistically. Also, for logistical reasons relating to the analysis time required and the cost of CAD analysis, the geometric parameters in all dogs were evaluated in only 1 vertebra from each of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study is limited by small group numbers, although the sample size was determined a priori using power analysis, and the sample size was sufficient to identify clear differences between dog groups for the number of calcified IVD. However, while the precision of CAD geometric analysis allows the detection of relatively minor geometric differences among bones without and with a deformity, 32 the small sample size increased the likelihood of type 2 statistical error, where numerical differences in vertebral geometry may not have been confirmed statistically. Also, for logistical reasons relating to the analysis time required and the cost of CAD analysis, the geometric parameters in all dogs were evaluated in only 1 vertebra from each of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%