2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of comorbidity indices for inpatient mortality prediction models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Comorbidity severity was evaluated with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); scores range from 0 to 37, and higher scores indicating worse comorbidity severity (34). This questionnaire has been previously used in a Brazilian population, and its validity was examined (35). Depressive symptoms were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and were defined as present if the score was greater than 16 (36).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidity severity was evaluated with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); scores range from 0 to 37, and higher scores indicating worse comorbidity severity (34). This questionnaire has been previously used in a Brazilian population, and its validity was examined (35). Depressive symptoms were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and were defined as present if the score was greater than 16 (36).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent study, however, it was found that non-medically trained raters and oncologists would have varying interpretations of comorbidity when assessing the same patient's medical records [6]. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) has been extensively studied and validated as a predictor of re-hospitalization [7], functional decline [8,9], and mortality in a number of populations [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] In addition, risk adjustment models have been validated for predicting outcome across a broad range of patients with and without preexisting respiratory illnesses. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Because of the especially high risk inherent to worsening of acute respiratory compromise, data relevant to gas exchange and the need for respiratory support are particularly applicable. 41 Thorough assessment of severity and risk may require consideration of several different models.…”
Section: The Current Challenge Of Respiratory Compromisementioning
confidence: 99%