2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11015-4_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of CNN-Based Single-Image Depth Estimation Methods

Abstract: While an increasing interest in deep models for single-image depth estimation (SIDE) can be observed, established schemes for their evaluation are still limited. We propose a set of novel quality criteria, allowing for a more detailed analysis by focusing on specific characteristics of depth maps. In particular, we address the preservation of edges and planar regions, depth consistency, and absolute distance accuracy. In order to employ these metrics to evaluate and compare state-of-the-art SIDE approaches, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, an Euclidean distance transform E = DT (Y bin ) is applied to the "ground truth" binary edges image and distances are truncated to a maximum of 10 pixels. Pixels E i in E exceeding 10 pixels distance are ignored in order to evaluate predicted edges only in the local neighborhood of the ground truth edges (we refer the reader to the authors original paper [15] for further details). Finally, the depth boundary accuracy error is defined as:…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, an Euclidean distance transform E = DT (Y bin ) is applied to the "ground truth" binary edges image and distances are truncated to a maximum of 10 pixels. Pixels E i in E exceeding 10 pixels distance are ignored in order to evaluate predicted edges only in the local neighborhood of the ground truth edges (we refer the reader to the authors original paper [15] for further details). Finally, the depth boundary accuracy error is defined as:…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make quantitative evaluation of roofs planarity, we evaluate the flatness and orientation of 3D planes π p k fitted to predicted roof surface points P p k;m,n in comparison to 3D planes π t k fitted to the ground truth roof surface points P t k;m,n , as proposed by (Koch et al, 2019). Mainly, the flatness error…”
Section: Roofs Planaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First approaches to SIDE for indoor scenes using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were presented by Eigen et al [11,10]. Ever since then, various methods for the prediction [28,35,30,34,21,53] and evaluation [25] of depth maps for indoor scenes have been proposed. SIDE in unstructured outdoor environments poses an even greater challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%