Evaluation of Cluster Front Line Demonstration in Greengram Crop

Mishra, Kabita; Panigrahi, S.

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.387

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence location specific recommendations are necessary to bridge the gap. These findings are similar to the findings of Patel et al [11] and Mishra et al [14].…”

Section: Technology Gapsupporting

confidence: 93%

Impact of Technology Demonstration on Productivity of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) in North Eastern Ghat Zone of Odisha

Samantaray

Rahman

Panda

et al. 2020

JEAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study was conducted to recognize the technological impact of proper package of practice for the production and productivity of Greengram in comparison to the traditional practices followed by the farmers of Ganjam district of Odisha. To enable impact assessment 100 farmers of which 50 farmers followed technology demonstration and 50 followed traditional method of cultivation were selected for the study. The results of technology demonstrations showed that farmers got increased productivity of Greengram notably by switching over to improved variety and adoption of improved production technology. From the experiment it was observed that the improved Greengram variety IPM 02-14 recorded the 42.5% higher yield compared to the local variety PDM-139. Technology gap and the technology index values were 230 kg/ha and 23%, respectively. Farmers are experiencing yield loss due to the high incidence of yellow mosaic vein diseases of the crop. The increment in productivity of the crop under technology demonstrations was not only due the adopting improved variety which is resistant to yellow mosaic vein diseases but also following other attributing factors like seed treatment with bio-fertilizers, proper seed rate, application of herbicide, judicious dose of fertilizers and plant protection measure.

show abstract

“…Hence location specific recommendations are necessary to bridge the gap. These findings are similar to the findings of Patel et al [11] and Mishra et al [14].…”

Section: Technology Gapsupporting

confidence: 93%

Impact of Technology Demonstration on Productivity of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) in North Eastern Ghat Zone of Odisha

Samantaray

Rahman

Panda

et al. 2020

JEAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a result, it appears that locality-specific solutions are required to close the yield gap. These findings are very comparable to those of [17] and [18].…”

Section: Technology Gapsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Extension yield gaps are evidence of farmers' lack of information about the benefits of adopting new farm technologies [20]. The findings are consistent with those of [17] and [18], who claimed that location-specific problems and treatments could have a huge impact on crop output.…”

Section: Extension Gapsupporting

confidence: 72%

Performance of Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on Integrated Crop Management in Red Gram (Cajanus cajan) Using Variety PRG-176 in Peddapalli District under North Agroclimatic Zone of Telangana State in India

Venkanna

Rao

Srinivas

et al. 2022

AJAEES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study was conducted under CFLD at the farmers’ fields under the Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Ramagirikhilla, Peddapalli District operational area for three kharif seasons during 2016-17 to 2019-20 covering 169 locations. The demonstrated technology delineated the practices of improved selection (PRG-176), seed treatment with Rhizobium @ 250 g acre-I, soil application of Trichoderma viridii @ 2kg acre-I mixing with FYM @ one hundred kilo acre-I and plant protection measures with installation of pheromone traps @ four per acre, spraying of neem oil @one liter acre-I and Profenofos 50 EC @ 400ml acre-I. The result of demonstration showed higher productivity notably as 15.91 q ha-I compared to the farmers practice (13.42 q ha-I) with a mean increase of 19.50%. Technology index and technology gap values were 59.57 per cent and 4.08 q ha-I respectively. The results conjointly unconcealed that the typical increase within the net return with demonstration was 55248 Rs. ha-I and 40651 Rs. ha-I over farmers practice respectively. Similarly, mean benefit cost ratio was recorded with demonstration as 2.63 compared to farmers practice (2.18) throughout the years of trial. Adoption of improved technology as well as new selection, timely supply of essential inputs with correct steering by the human, frequent watching visits to fields diagnose the issues and take applicable corrective measures, field days etc., can be the contributive factors for prime yield with smart quality in all told demonstration plots.

show abstract

“…The technology gap may be attributed to variations in soil fertility status, inconsistent weather conditions, and the management practices used for specific crop cultivars under trial and demonstration fields. This result was found to be similar to the findings of Mishra et al (2018), who identified that location-specific recommendations appear to be necessary to bridge gaps.…”

Section: Yield Performance and Gaps In Pearl Millet Technologysupporting

confidence: 87%

“…8) of each rank is converted into a score and referenced with Garrett's table (Table 6b). The positive and negative sides of the stakeholders involved in pearl millet promotion were assessed via SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis (Mishra et al, 2018). The qualitative field day data were explained in thematic-oriented narration.…”

Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Pearl millet, the hope of food security in marginal arid tropics: implications for diversifying limited cropping systems

Mihiretu¹,

Assefa²,

Wubet³

2023

J. Agribus. Rural Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pearl millet has great potential to withstand climate-related risks in marginal areas. However, much remains unknown as to how it contributes to income and food security at the smallholder level. As a result, this study assessed the contributions of pearl millet to the farmers’ income and food security, its production constraints, and connections between stakeholders in the marginal arid tropics of Northeast Amhara. The technology was promoted for five (2015–2019) production years, and data from 223 samples were analyzed. The new pearl millet technology provided better yield (1420 kg·ha-1) and net return (42328 ETB ha-1) than sorghum, even in difficult climatic conditions. Despite the higher cost of production, its additional returns (31638) and effective gains (28838) were higher across the years. The results of the sensory evaluation revealed that “Enjera”, “Tella”, Bread, and Porridge were the farmers’ 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th food type choices of pearl millet, respectively. The trend towards acceptance of the technology made up a large number of the farmers, as 79.5% of those who participated applied the full technology package. Those who did not apply the full package did so due to labor shortages, technological complexity, and insufficient practical training. Therefore, climate-smart pearl millet crop technology is recommended for better and consistent production in marginal arid-tropical areas.

show abstract

Evaluation of Cluster Front Line Demonstration in Greengram Crop

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Impact of Technology Demonstration on Productivity of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) in North Eastern Ghat Zone of Odisha

Impact of Technology Demonstration on Productivity of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) in North Eastern Ghat Zone of Odisha

Performance of Cluster Front Line Demonstrations on Integrated Crop Management in Red Gram (Cajanus cajan) Using Variety PRG-176 in Peddapalli District under North Agroclimatic Zone of Telangana State in India

Pearl millet, the hope of food security in marginal arid tropics: implications for diversifying limited cropping systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About