2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of circulating cell-free KRAS mutational status as a molecular monitoring tool in patients with pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies, including multiple meta‐analyses, support the prognostic potential of ctDNA detection in plasma, demonstrating that patients in whom ctDNA is detected have a significantly worse prognosis than those in whom it is not detected [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Some studies have also explored the relationship between ctDNA and imaging, showing associations between the dynamics of ctDNA and the radiological response [ 11 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. These studies are only observational and evidence of a benefit of ctDNA‐based treatment decisions is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies, including multiple meta‐analyses, support the prognostic potential of ctDNA detection in plasma, demonstrating that patients in whom ctDNA is detected have a significantly worse prognosis than those in whom it is not detected [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Some studies have also explored the relationship between ctDNA and imaging, showing associations between the dynamics of ctDNA and the radiological response [ 11 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. These studies are only observational and evidence of a benefit of ctDNA‐based treatment decisions is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An even more drastic risk stratification can be applied for PFS (2.5 vs. 7.7 months). Recently, the prognostic impact of the relative change of ctDNA between treatment initiation and restaging has been shown in a small cohort (n = 14) by commercial test kits ( 16 ). However, to the best of our knowledge, a cutoff for MAF dynamics with a direct impact on the outcome for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer has not been described so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, liquid biopsy allows detection rates of only 50%–65% in metastatic PDAC ( 3 , 11 , 15 ). While the prognostic value of ctDNA positivity prior to treatment has been validated for metastatic PDAC ( 13 , 16 ), there is no established cutoff value for the ctDNA change reflecting an early response to treatment. Thus, we aimed to evaluate if a patient-normalized threshold based on the dynamic change of ctDNA during systemic treatment can predict response to systemic treatment and clinical outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study based on 110 PDAC patients reported that those with KRAS mutations have significantly shorter PFS and OS (5.3/6.9 months ( p = 0.044) vs. 11.8/19.9 months ( p = 0.037), respectively) [ 26 ]. Another study detecting the circulating cell-free tumor-DNA (cft-DNA) of 29 PDAC patients showed that the survival of patients with detectable plasma KRAS mutations pre-treatment was significantly worse (16.8 months vs. not reached, p < 0.031) [ 27 ]. A study comparing PDAC patients treated with surgery to chemotherapy showed that the detectable plasma KRAS mutation is an independent predictor of early recurrence after surgery, while not showing a significant difference in PFS after chemotherapy [ 28 ].…”
Section: Kras Mutations In Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%