2021
DOI: 10.4236/acs.2021.114046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of CHIRPS Satellite Gridded Dataset as an Alternative Rainfall Estimate for Localized Modelling over Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indicators used to evaluate the performance were the correlation coefficient (R), percent bias (PBias), RMSE-observation Standard deviation Ratio (RSR), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient (NSE). Furthermore, the range of R, Pbias, RSR, and NSE was 0-1, -∞ -∞, 0 -∞, and -∞ -1, with the best value being 1, 0, 0, and 1, respectively [35], [54], [55].…”
Section: ) Chirps Data Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The indicators used to evaluate the performance were the correlation coefficient (R), percent bias (PBias), RMSE-observation Standard deviation Ratio (RSR), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient (NSE). Furthermore, the range of R, Pbias, RSR, and NSE was 0-1, -∞ -∞, 0 -∞, and -∞ -1, with the best value being 1, 0, 0, and 1, respectively [35], [54], [55].…”
Section: ) Chirps Data Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This research used reanalyzed precipitation information in grid format due to the limitations of in-situ observation data at the location [35]- [37]. The performance test was to evaluate extreme precipitation as performed in previous results [38]- [41].…”
Section: B Datamentioning
confidence: 99%