2010
DOI: 10.1021/es101092g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Chemical, Molecular, and Traditional Markers of Fecal Contamination in an Effluent Dominated Urban Stream

Abstract: In this paper we present a quantitative sanitary survey of the Middle Santa Ana River, in southern California, utilizing a variety of source tracking tools, including traditional culture-dependent fecal markers (Enterococcus and Escherichia coli by IDEXX), speciation of enterococci isolates, culture-independent fecal markers (human-specific HF183 Bacteroides and Enterococcus by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, qPCR), and chemical markers of sewage and wastewater (nutrients, enantiomeric fraction (EF) of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Slow release of microbes from hyporheic porewater back to the water column can contribute significantly to overall downstream transport and disease transmission risks. 23,24 The repeated deposition and resuspension of microbes combined with long periods of immobilization between resuspension events leads to a wide distribution of in-stream residence times. Reversible storage of microbes occur at both the stream reach-scale (e.g., via hyporheic exchange) and locally within sediments (e.g reversible filtration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Slow release of microbes from hyporheic porewater back to the water column can contribute significantly to overall downstream transport and disease transmission risks. 23,24 The repeated deposition and resuspension of microbes combined with long periods of immobilization between resuspension events leads to a wide distribution of in-stream residence times. Reversible storage of microbes occur at both the stream reach-scale (e.g., via hyporheic exchange) and locally within sediments (e.g reversible filtration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surrounding marshy and muddy shoreline and river discharge may function as bacterial sources and may also provide necessary nutrients for bacterial growth within the sand (Litton et al, 2010). Ideally, sediment samples should be analyzed from the Big Bend beach sites in order to test the hypothesis that low energy beaches are conducive to bacterial accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field et al [19] evaluates the application of fecal source tracking as a better method for human health risk assessments and managing water quality compared to current reliance on FIB criteria. Litton et al [39] further identifies fecal markers and source tracking tools which could vastly change the approach to FIB monitoring and regulation. These studies and the one presented here provide data on FIB concentrations in selected streams with respect to concentration, relationship to recreational water-quality standards, and influence of environmental factors such as streamflow, rainfall, sediment, and runoff [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%