2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp06510b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of charge-transfer rates in fullerene-based donor–acceptor dyads with different density functional approximations

Abstract: The shift towards renewable energy is one of the main challenges of this generation. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC), based on donor-acceptor architectures, can help on this transition as they present...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] Recently, some of us have benchmarked different density functional approximations and showed that CAM-B3LYP functional is the best choice for evaluation of charge-transfer rates in fullerene-based materials. [22] The empirical dispersion D3 correction was computed using the Becke-Johnson damping scheme. [23] The population analysis and calculation of Hirshfeld [24] and CM5 [25] charges were carried out with the Gaussian 16 program.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Recently, some of us have benchmarked different density functional approximations and showed that CAM-B3LYP functional is the best choice for evaluation of charge-transfer rates in fullerene-based materials. [22] The empirical dispersion D3 correction was computed using the Becke-Johnson damping scheme. [23] The population analysis and calculation of Hirshfeld [24] and CM5 [25] charges were carried out with the Gaussian 16 program.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 , 17 The CAMY-B3LYP functional has shown to provide accurate results for charge-transfer excitations in naphthalene derivatives and is therefore a suitable functional to study the PAHs in this work. 23 For more detailed information on the CAMY-B3LYP functional, we refer to ref ( 22b ).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 The empirical dispersion D3 correction was included using the Becke-Johnson damping scheme. 34,35 Vertical excitation energies were calculated using the TDA formalism 36 with the range-separated CAM-B3LYP 37,38 functional and the def2-SVP basis set, 32,33 as implemented in the Gaussian 16 (rev. A03) program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%