2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam for serious infections due to multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ceftazidime-avibactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor currently approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections [5,6], complicated urinary tract infections [7], hospital-acquired pneumonia (including ventilator-associated pneumonia), and more generally, for aerobic gram-negative infections with limited treatment options [8]. In real-life experiences, high rates of favorable response to ceftazidime-avibactam treatment are reported in patients with infections due to carbapenem−resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), with an overall success rate of about 70% [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], whereas post-marketing experience regarding the use of ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to MDR-GNB other than CRE remains scarce [16][17][18] Moreover, information regarding features associated with clinical failures and the emergence of resistance in this group of patients are even scarcer. For this reason, in this multicenter study we describe our experience about the use of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections due to MDR-GNB other than CRE in 13 Italian hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceftazidime-avibactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor currently approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections [5,6], complicated urinary tract infections [7], hospital-acquired pneumonia (including ventilator-associated pneumonia), and more generally, for aerobic gram-negative infections with limited treatment options [8]. In real-life experiences, high rates of favorable response to ceftazidime-avibactam treatment are reported in patients with infections due to carbapenem−resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), with an overall success rate of about 70% [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], whereas post-marketing experience regarding the use of ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to MDR-GNB other than CRE remains scarce [16][17][18] Moreover, information regarding features associated with clinical failures and the emergence of resistance in this group of patients are even scarcer. For this reason, in this multicenter study we describe our experience about the use of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections due to MDR-GNB other than CRE in 13 Italian hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, avibactam not only inhibits ESBLs, but also effectively inhibits class A carbapenemases such as AmpC beta-lactamases and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) [7,14,15] . Avibactam has in vitro activity against Ambler class A, C, and some class D serine betalactamases, but not against metallo-beta-lactamases [1,4] . Studies have revealed that C/T and CZA are more effective against MDR infections than other cephalosporins and beta-lactamase inhibitors [11,14] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar to the current study comparing the efficacy of C/T and CZA against MDR P. aeruginosa strains, there are a few other studies in the literature that compare the efficacy of these two drugs [6,7,22,23] . In some of these studies, C/T-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were found to be susceptible to CZA, while most demonstrated that C/T had greater in vitro inhibitory activity than CZA (Table 3) [1,7] . In a large study investigating 309 resistant (to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and/ or piperacillin-tazobactam) P. aeruginosa isolates, Humphries et al [7] reported 52.4% and 27.6% C/T and CZA susceptibility in beta-lactam and carbapenem-resistant strains, respectively.…”
Section: 1%mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations