2016
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.174804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of caudal dexamethasone with ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia in paediatric herniotomies: A randomised controlled study

Abstract: Background and Aims:Caudal analgesia is one of the most popular regional blocks in paediatric patients undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries but with the drawback of short duration of action after single shot local anaesthetic injection. We evaluated whether caudal dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg as an adjuvant to the ropivacaine improved analgesic efficacy after paediatric herniotomies.Methods:Totally 128 patients of 1–5 years age group, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II undergoing electi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis included 5 trials with a total of 376 participants, of whom 194 were assigned to THE experimental group (the group receiving caudal block and dexamethasone) and the other 182 to THE control group (the group receiving plain caudal block). With significant heterogeneity ( P < .00001, I2 = 93%), we calculated the overall effects using a random effects model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This analysis included 5 trials with a total of 376 participants, of whom 194 were assigned to THE experimental group (the group receiving caudal block and dexamethasone) and the other 182 to THE control group (the group receiving plain caudal block). With significant heterogeneity ( P < .00001, I2 = 93%), we calculated the overall effects using a random effects model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Postoperative wound dehiscence was seen in 1 case from THE experimental group and THE control group, and the 2 patients recovered with conservative care within the 3‐month follow‐up period. Other side effects, such as bradycardia, pruritis, shivering, wound infection, delayed wound healing, and urinary retention, also presented no significant difference between these 2 methods. In our review, the postoperative complications regarding delayed wound healing, dehiscence, or infection were not clearly defined and there were no studies that followed patients long enough to make this determination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations