2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Calprotectin Level in Intestinal Content as an Early Marker for Graft Rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several molecules have been suggested as biomarkers of rejection (e.g. calprotectin, citrulline, granzymeB and perforin), they generally lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be widely applicable (3,32–37). The results obtained during this study suggest that microbial profiling may be a potential diagnostic marker for graft rejection that could be used in conjunction with existing diagnostic tools to monitor SBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several molecules have been suggested as biomarkers of rejection (e.g. calprotectin, citrulline, granzymeB and perforin), they generally lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be widely applicable (3,32–37). The results obtained during this study suggest that microbial profiling may be a potential diagnostic marker for graft rejection that could be used in conjunction with existing diagnostic tools to monitor SBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calprotectin levels could not distinguish between any pathologic states, however. Another study of 137 samples from 11 patients [23] found no significant difference between normal and rejection, in part because of wide variability, and suggested a cutoff of 65 mg/g stool had a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 47% to detect rejection. They concluded that stool calprotectin was perhaps not a unique marker for rejection, but rather a marker of normality and stability.…”
Section: Calprotectinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other biomarkers employed in this case also failed to convincingly point towards a diagnosis of rejection. Fluctuations in the levels of biomarkers such as faecal calprotectin and plasma citrulline implied underlying graft rejection, but their validity in reliably identifying underlying pathoaetiology is contested [ 17 , 18 ]. Additionally, in the absence of clear microscopic and macroscopic evidence of rejection, the presence of Class I anti-HLA-B37 antibodies alone does not strongly point towards a diagnosis of rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%