2011
DOI: 10.5589/m11-017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of C-band polarization diversity and polarimetry for wetland mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Addition of phase information may improve wetland classification [102,103], while fully polarimetric data allow an array of polarimetric decomposition techniques that have been successfully used for characterization and classification of wetlands [60,104]. In addition, interferometric data can provide improved topographic information or vegetation surface model data that could improve classifications.…”
Section: Random Forest Classifier Performance and Variable Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addition of phase information may improve wetland classification [102,103], while fully polarimetric data allow an array of polarimetric decomposition techniques that have been successfully used for characterization and classification of wetlands [60,104]. In addition, interferometric data can provide improved topographic information or vegetation surface model data that could improve classifications.…”
Section: Random Forest Classifier Performance and Variable Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictor variables listed in Table 3 also include the coefficient of variation from a 3 × 3-pixel moving window applied to the HH and HV PALSAR images; it was used as a texture metric to evaluate how spatial heterogeneity in backscatter intensity can contribute to improving the discrimination of the wetland classes [58,59]. PALSAR L-band polarization intensity ratio HV/HH was selected for its effectiveness in discriminating flooded from non-flooded vegetation and water [47], while HH/HV demonstrated similar characteristics using SAR C-band data [60]. Full description of metrics with associated citations is given in [55].…”
Section: Palsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the user to decompose the SAR backscatter being returned from the objects being sensed into four common scattering types: (1) specular scattering (no return to the SAR), which occurs from smoother surfaces such as calm water or bare soil; (2) rough scattering, which results when there is a single bounce return to the SAR from surfaces such as small shrubs or rough water; (3) volume scattering, which is when the signal is backscattered in multiple directions from features such as vegetation canopies; and (4) double-bounce or dihedral scattering, which results when two smooth surfaces create a right angle that deflects the incoming radar signal off both surfaces such that most of the energy is returned to the sensor. This latter scattering case typically occurs when vertical emergent vegetation is surrounded by a visible, smooth water surface [32,[47][48][49][50][51]. Flooded vegetation can also have a combination of double-bounce and volume backscattering [50,51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dual-channel SAR systems the signal can be both co-polarized (transmitted and received energy as HH or VV) and cross-polarized (transmitted and received as HV or VH). With the advancement of fully polarimetric satellite systems such as RADARSAT-2 the satellite can transmit and receive energy in all four planes (HH, VV, HV and VH), maintaining the phase and allowing for mapping of the different scattering mechanisms within a wetland [49], rather than just the difference between low and high backscatter values (Figure 1). The phase measures the time it takes for the radar signal sent from the satellite to interact with the target on the ground and return to the satellite [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been recognized as an important source of data for water resource applications (Brisco et al 2008). For surface water and flooding applications, the lack of backscatter from the specular water surface allows for easy delineation of open water, while the flooded vegetation in wetlands results in an enhanced backscatter due to double-bounce scattering (Hess, Melack, and Simonett 1990;Kasischke and Bourgeau-Chavez 1997;Pope et al 1997;Brisco et al 2009Brisco et al , 2011. The 'all-weather' data collection capability combined with the information content makes SAR an attractive sensor for wetland applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%