SAE Technical Paper Series 1997
DOI: 10.4271/970037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Burn Rate Routines and Analysis Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition can be inferred by using MFB models, e.g. Rassweiller and Withrow model [28], assuming complete combustion and using initial known variables, such as the injected fuel ( , ) or the air admitted ( , ). In this manner, the only unknown is the residual gasses, which can be obtained as a function of the total mass.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition can be inferred by using MFB models, e.g. Rassweiller and Withrow model [28], assuming complete combustion and using initial known variables, such as the injected fuel ( , ) or the air admitted ( , ). In this manner, the only unknown is the residual gasses, which can be obtained as a function of the total mass.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rassweiler et al [16] introduced an SOC detection method using pressure rise due to combustion, and McCuiston et al [17] and Mittal et al [18] proposed a simplified HR model [9,19,20]. These methods describe the combustion process well; however, it is difficult to apply them to real-time applications due to great data acquisition until the end of combustion as well as high computational load.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In fact, as far as the imep evaluation is concerned, an erroneous adjustment of the TDC reference position has been recognized to be a major error source: an uncertainty of 1°CA is expected to provide a change of up to 10% in the calculated value of the imep from the pressure-volume indicated diagram [10]. The effects that crank angle phasing errors can have on the heat release rate and mass fraction burnt have not been clearly defined and quantified [11]. Finally, the measurement noise should be removed from the pressure signal by means of a numerical treatment, which is usually applied after the data have been averaged over several consecutive cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%