2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-021-02242-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Brauer elements over local fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of rationally connected varieties one can use [16,Prop. 7] in order to weaken the hypothesis in Proposition 3.3.…”
Section: Evis Ieronymoumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of rationally connected varieties one can use [16,Prop. 7] in order to weaken the hypothesis in Proposition 3.3.…”
Section: Evis Ieronymoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cit. If v / ∈ T then it follows from [16,Prop. 7] that we can replace l v by any F v -point, call it again Q v , without changing the value of the evaluation map given by any element of Br(X).…”
Section: Evis Ieronymoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If v ∈ T then we replace l v by some Q v as in the proof of loc.sit. If v / ∈ T then it follows from [17,Prop. 7] that we can replace l v by any F v -point, call it again Q v , without changing the value of the evaluation map given by any element of Br(X).…”
Section: Generalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) In the case of rationally connected varieties one can combine the aforementioned formal argument with [17,Prop. 7] in order to weaken the hypothesis in Proposition 3.3 that (wP 1 ) holds over all completions to the hypothesis that it holds over a finite set of places, see Proposition 3.6 for a precise statement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%