2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of bone volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have been published on bone graft stability based on two‐dimensional imaging techniques, demonstrating a significant decrease in augmented bone height within 6‐24 months after sinus lifting . Studies have also been reported on the three‐dimensional (3D) volume stability of these grafts . Although being numerous, these studies differ substantially regarding follow‐up time, method of evaluation, bone graft material, and surgical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies have been published on bone graft stability based on two‐dimensional imaging techniques, demonstrating a significant decrease in augmented bone height within 6‐24 months after sinus lifting . Studies have also been reported on the three‐dimensional (3D) volume stability of these grafts . Although being numerous, these studies differ substantially regarding follow‐up time, method of evaluation, bone graft material, and surgical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of autogenous bone (AB) is still considered the gold standard in bone grafting due to its superior biological advantages such as osteogenic, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive properties . However, high resorption rates up to 84% and the need for a second surgical site associated with patient morbidity required to be acknowledged . To compensate for these limitations, biomaterials have been introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although autogenous bone is regarded as the gold standard, autogenous bone grafts can also exhibit unpredictable bone resorption, which may not be a desirable characteristic in sinus grafting. Indeed the practice of augmented sinuses using autogenous bone as the sole grafting material has been shown to undergo significant re-pneumatization and augmented volume loss according to several clinical reports found in the literature [13,14,15,16], which has led to searches for alternative graft materials. Therefore, the goal is to seek an ideal scaffold that provides good mechanical support temporarily while maintaining bioactivity, and which can biodegrade later at a tailorable rate [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If bone loss is significant, intraoral facial prosthetics are the only realistic option for recovering the facial profile and some degree of oral function, such as speaking, mastication and swallowing. Autogenous bone is the gold-standard material for such reconstruction because it has a high inherent physiological capacity for bone formation and demonstrates similar mechanical properties to those of the excised bone [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] , but also carries the risk of extensive bone resorption at the donor site 6) . A heterograft may be used as an alternative, but is itself complicated by the possibility of cross-infection 8,9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%