2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…No study included only paediatric patients. Sixteen studies included patients with class III, [ 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ] six studies with class II, [ 15 , 16 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] and 10 studies with both class II and class III malocclusion patients [ 2 , 13 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. One study did not specify the malocclusion of the included patients [ 17 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…No study included only paediatric patients. Sixteen studies included patients with class III, [ 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ] six studies with class II, [ 15 , 16 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] and 10 studies with both class II and class III malocclusion patients [ 2 , 13 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. One study did not specify the malocclusion of the included patients [ 17 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all included articles, 14 were publications of RCTs, [ 2 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 50 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ] and 4 of these publications were from the same RCT with different follow‐up times [ 2 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]; three were prospective cohort studies [ 45 , 51 , 52 ]; and 16 were retrospective cohort studies [ 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 53 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Seven publications of RCTs were assessed having ‘some concerns’ regarding risk of bias (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations