2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Biological Activated Carbon (BAC) process in wastewater treatment secondary effluent for reclamation purposes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biomass accumulated rapidly in the upper layer of ACC/QSDLBF, and biodegradation removal occurred at the top of the biofilter, whereas the lower growth rate at the bottom of ACC/QSDLBF was ascribed to a decreasing availability of organic nutrients downward through the filter (Xiang et al 2013). Considering that organic matter removal in the biofilter is roughly proportional to existing biomass, the result was along the expected lines (Kalkan et al 2011). In study of Liao et al (2013), DOC and AOC were mainly removed in the firststage BAC filter, especially in the top 20-cm GAC layer.…”
Section: Development Of Head Loss In Acc/qsdlbf and Qsslbf During Stesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biomass accumulated rapidly in the upper layer of ACC/QSDLBF, and biodegradation removal occurred at the top of the biofilter, whereas the lower growth rate at the bottom of ACC/QSDLBF was ascribed to a decreasing availability of organic nutrients downward through the filter (Xiang et al 2013). Considering that organic matter removal in the biofilter is roughly proportional to existing biomass, the result was along the expected lines (Kalkan et al 2011). In study of Liao et al (2013), DOC and AOC were mainly removed in the firststage BAC filter, especially in the top 20-cm GAC layer.…”
Section: Development Of Head Loss In Acc/qsdlbf and Qsslbf During Stesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Most of the COD Mn removal in QSSLBF occurred in the first 40-cm-thickness quartz sand layer, and the surface 20-cm quartz sand accomplished 67.69 % total COD Mn removal. Compared with ACC/QSDLBF and BAC, the COD Mn removal of QSSLBF was largely dependent on the interception of insoluble organic matters, and the dissolved organic matter removal was low due to weak biodegradation capacity with respect to low existing biomass (Kalkan et al 2011). …”
Section: Development Of Head Loss In Acc/qsdlbf and Qsslbf During Stementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, discrete utilization of water resources and reuse of treated wastewater for different purposes have been recognized as the most effective ways of conserving the limited resources of freshwater [1]. The presence of microorganisms and heavy metals is the main indication of water contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some advanced post-treatment technologies or the addition of pretreatment units to the existing water treatment plants, including magnetic ion exchange [10], UV/H 2 O 2 [11,12], peroxone (H 2 O 2 /O 3 ) [13], the TiO 2 photocatalytic process [14,15], UV/H 2 O 2 -granulated activated carbon (GAC) [16], ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes [17], nutshell carbons filtration [18] and ozone-biological activated carbon [19,20], have been increasingly used in the treatment of drinking water prior to disinfection to enhance the DOM removal and to prevent the generation of DBPs. A treatment method employing a CTP followed by an ozonation integrated with a biologically activated carbon (O 3 -BAC) process has been reported to be effective in the removal of certain organic contaminants during drinking water treatment [21,22]. Although a significant amount of studies have been conducted on O 3 -BAC, the application of the research findings is still somewhat limited by the contradictory results obtained in the previous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 39%