2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of biochemical effects related to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid exposure in organohalogen-contaminated great tit (Parus major) and blue tit (Parus caeruleus) nestlings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
30
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, increasing blood plasma concentrations of liver enzymes may also be a result of e.g., hypoxia, inflammation, diet, infection, neoplasia, trauma, metabolic abnormalities (storage diseases), endocrine diseases and/or hepatocyte regeneration (Ettinger and Feldman, 1995;Thrall et al, 2006). Previous studies have shown that PFOS and PFOA increase blood plasma concentrations of ALAT (Hoff et al, 2005;Yahia et al, 2010). This is not in accordance with our findings in white-tailed eagles, indicating that the relationship between BCCPs and OHCs are not always obvious and that studies like the present are not designed to pinpoint cause-and-effect relationships.…”
Section: Relationships Between Ohcs and Bccpscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, increasing blood plasma concentrations of liver enzymes may also be a result of e.g., hypoxia, inflammation, diet, infection, neoplasia, trauma, metabolic abnormalities (storage diseases), endocrine diseases and/or hepatocyte regeneration (Ettinger and Feldman, 1995;Thrall et al, 2006). Previous studies have shown that PFOS and PFOA increase blood plasma concentrations of ALAT (Hoff et al, 2005;Yahia et al, 2010). This is not in accordance with our findings in white-tailed eagles, indicating that the relationship between BCCPs and OHCs are not always obvious and that studies like the present are not designed to pinpoint cause-and-effect relationships.…”
Section: Relationships Between Ohcs and Bccpscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In most biota, PCB is the dominating chlorinated pollutant, but in livers of songbirds and freshwater fish from Belgium [19,20] and in plasma from sea turtles on the east coast of North America [21], PFOS concentrations were several‐fold higher than ΣPCB. Also, in Arctic mammals, such as mink ( Mustela vison ), Arctic fox ( Alopex lagopus ), and polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ), PFOS concentrations have been high compared to ΣPCB [3,18,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the concentrations of most legacy OCs, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and OC pesticides, have decreased over the last three decades [13,14], those of PFCs and PBDEs have increased in many environments, including remote areas such as the Arctic [2,[15][16][17][18]. Recently, some studies have found levels of PFCs as high as those of legacy OCs in different biota [3,[19][20][21]. Little, however, is known about how the dif-ferent compounds are distributed among individuals within populations and what factors influence the distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of both PBDEs [12,13] and perfluorinated compounds [14,15] have now been documented in biota, including birds; and reproductive and physiological effects have been reported in birds for both PBDEs [16,17] and perfluorinated compounds [18][19][20]. Exposure to these chemicals of concerns, however, needs to be quantified and accounted for so that effects of the listed contaminants can be correctly assessed, especially for bird or animal deformities and reproductive problems beneficial use impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to these chemicals of concerns, however, needs to be quantified and accounted for so that effects of the listed contaminants can be correctly assessed, especially for bird or animal deformities and reproductive problems beneficial use impairment. Concentrations of both PBDEs [12,13] and perfluorinated compounds [14,15] have now been documented in biota, including birds; and reproductive and physiological effects have been reported in birds for both PBDEs [16,17] and perfluorinated compounds [18][19][20]. Comparative ranking among AOCs for PBDEs was recently reported for tree swallow eggs [4] but not for perfluorinated compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%