2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Bar, Barnase, and Barstar recombinant proteins expressed in genetically engineered Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) for potential risks of food allergy using bioinformatics and literature searches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AOL has been used by the sponsoring companies to evaluate potential risks of allergenicity of their GM proteins. It has also been used in studies to evaluate potential products developed by nonprofit organizations and academic developers for example, Indian mustard plants designed to enhance hybrid seed production .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AOL has been used by the sponsoring companies to evaluate potential risks of allergenicity of their GM proteins. It has also been used in studies to evaluate potential products developed by nonprofit organizations and academic developers for example, Indian mustard plants designed to enhance hybrid seed production .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioinformatic evaluations were then performed to investigate possible similarities with toxins or allergens using the NCBI Entrez Protein 8 database as well as the AllergenOnline.org database (Version 18), with methods previously described ( 14 , 15 ). BLASTP searches of the NCBI Entrez Protein database were done to compare any putative peptide sequences against all protein sequences to determine the prevalence of common homologs using keywords.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; ALA, α-linoleic acid, 18:3 9,12,15 ; CSIRO, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid, 22:6 4,7,10, 13,16,19 ; DHA canola, genetically engineered canola, event NS-B5ØØ27-4; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid, 22:5 7,10,13,16,19 ; DGLA, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid; DW, dry weight; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid, 20:5 5,8,11,14,17 ; ETA, eicosatetraenoic acid, 20:4 8,11,14,17 ; ETE, eicosatrienoic acid, 20:3 11,14,17 ; FA, fatty acid(s); GLA, γ-linolenic acid; GRAS, generally recognized a safe; Ha, hectares; ILSI, International Life Sciences Institute; LA, linoleic acid, 18:2 9,12 ; LC-MRM-MS, liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry; LC-MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; LCPUFA, long chain (≥C20) polyunsaturated fatty acids; LOD, limit of detection; LOQ, limit of quantification; Micpu-6D, Micromonas pusilla 6-desaturase; OA, oleic acid, 18:1 9 ; ORF, open reading frame; PAT, phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase; Pavsa-5D, Pavlova salina 5-desaturase; Picpa-ω3D, Pichia pastoris 15-/ω3-desaturase; Pyrco-5E, Pyramimonas cordata 5-elongase; SDA, stearidonic acid, 18:4 6,9,12,15 ; US FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration; ω3, omega-3; ω6, omega-6. 1 http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC Agricultural biotechnology has been widely adopted by growers demonstrating that the technology brings exceptional benefits for effective control of crop pests, reduced inputs, and increased cost savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, however, needs to be entered in the FASTA format [Pearson, 1988]. An additional database located on the FARRP website is a separate bioinformatic tool allowing to evaluate whether a protein belonging to the same subfamily as wheat gliadins, is similar enough to gluten to be able to induce symptoms typical of celiac disease Siruguri et al, 2015].…”
Section: Databases Of Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%