CVPR 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of background subtraction techniques for video surveillance

Abstract: Background subtraction is one of the key techniques for automatic video analysis, especially in the domain of video surveillance. Although its importance, evaluations of recent background subtraction methods with respect to the challenges of video surveillance suffer from various shortcomings. To address this issue, we first identify the main challenges of background subtraction in the field of video surveillance. We then compare the performance of nine background subtraction methods with post-processing accor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
349
1
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 511 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
349
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus recommended to include postprocessing operations, even when comparing techniques. This was also the conclusion of Brutzer et al [24] and Benezeth et al [14]. Note that other filters can be used such as temporal filters, shadow filters [24], and complex spatio-temporal filtering techniques to relabel the classification results.…”
Section: Spatial Aggregation Markovian Models and Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is thus recommended to include postprocessing operations, even when comparing techniques. This was also the conclusion of Brutzer et al [24] and Benezeth et al [14]. Note that other filters can be used such as temporal filters, shadow filters [24], and complex spatio-temporal filtering techniques to relabel the classification results.…”
Section: Spatial Aggregation Markovian Models and Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The average processing time on a sequence of 100 RGB frames with resolution 600 × 800 with image alignment and background motion estimation is about 665 seconds, which is decreased to 195 seconds with CSSP, meaning a time-saving of more than 3.4 times. We perform extensive tests using four datasets [20], [21], [22], [23], comprised of 49 videos with various challenges. This allows us to compare our method to a large number of alternative methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both techniques can also be combined. Note that post-processing techniques are known to always increase the performance [3,12]. In this paper, we study the performance of the BGS without any post-processing.…”
Section: The Traditional Processing Pipeline Of Bgs Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%