2022
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2022-989-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Azure Kinect Derived Point Clouds to Determine the Presence of Microhabitats on Single Trees Based on the Swiss Standard Parameters

Abstract: Abstract. In the last few years, a number of low-cost 3D scanning sensors have been developed to reconstruct the real-world environment. These sensors were primarily designed for indoor use, making them highly unpredictable in terms of their performance and accuracy when used outdoors. The Azure Kinect belongs to this category of low-cost 3D scanners and has been successfully employed in outdoor applications. In addition, this sensor possesses features such as portability and live visualization during data acq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While parallel developments in aerial lidar acquisition have also seen significant improvements, especially in miniaturisation (Corte et al, 2020), assessing under-storey vegetation is used to answer very specific questions, which may only be addressed using data obtained via terrestrial techniques. This includes, for example, the monitoring of tree growth (Brolly et al, 2013) or tree microhabitats (Fol et al, 2022), for both of which the level of detail provided by aerial lidar is often insufficient simply due to occlusions in forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While parallel developments in aerial lidar acquisition have also seen significant improvements, especially in miniaturisation (Corte et al, 2020), assessing under-storey vegetation is used to answer very specific questions, which may only be addressed using data obtained via terrestrial techniques. This includes, for example, the monitoring of tree growth (Brolly et al, 2013) or tree microhabitats (Fol et al, 2022), for both of which the level of detail provided by aerial lidar is often insufficient simply due to occlusions in forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the costs for lidar data acquisition has remained high in recent years thus often requiring researchers to choose between quality and budget in many financially constrained projects. A possible solution to this problem is the use of alternative 3D mapping techniques such as close-range photogrammetry and depth cameras (Fol et al, 2022). However, these solutions present users with another problem: notably the strictly convergent nature of photogrammetric acquisition networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widespread forest 3D model data are point clouds acquired by TLS or airborne lidar. However, thanks to progress made in low-cost 3D scanning technology, the source of forest 3D point clouds is likely to progressively diversify (Mokroš et al, 2018, Fol et al, 2022, Kükenbrink et al, 2022. Nevertheless, point clouds are certainly going to remain the preferred 3D format in the forestry field for the time being due to its heterogeneous and complex environment which is quite difficult to model using other 3D representations, such as meshes or geometric primitives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%