2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of axis straightness error of shaft and hole parts based on improved grey wolf optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dokur et al [22] used GWO to solve a short-term wind speed-prediction problem with a multilayer perceptron, and the results showed that the algorithm was more effective than other algorithms. Song et al [23] used GWO to optimize the shaft straightness error assessment of shaft hole-type parts, and the results confirmed that the algorithm was more accurate in solving this problem.…”
Section: Intelligent Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dokur et al [22] used GWO to solve a short-term wind speed-prediction problem with a multilayer perceptron, and the results showed that the algorithm was more effective than other algorithms. Song et al [23] used GWO to optimize the shaft straightness error assessment of shaft hole-type parts, and the results confirmed that the algorithm was more accurate in solving this problem.…”
Section: Intelligent Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The first step is to roughly calculate the cost of each unit and form a set E in ascending order to evaluate the real-time efficiency of each unit. The calculation is shown as Equation (23).…”
Section: Power Balance Constraint Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some algorithms have improved GWO performance by modifying and adjusting parameters. Song et al [40] proposed IGWO, which enhanced exploration by modifying linear convergence factor to nonlinear; The improved grey wolf optimizer also adjusted a nonlinear parameter of GWO based on polynomials [41], and showed accurate measurement results in the optimization of seepage parameters; However, these nonlinear strategies have only succeeded in improving the performance of GWO in some aspects. For example, improved GWO [42] was beneficial to improve the convergence performance of unimodal functions, but has a poor effect on multimodal functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song Yusheng et al used IGWO to optimize an SVM. They aimed at the problems of low efficiency and easily falling into a local optimum in GWO optimization and improved the traditional GWO model through nonlinear control and random weight position updating [24]. The test results showed that the model effectively improved the fault diagnosis efficiency and recognition rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%