2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2017.7995950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of automated vehicles encountering pedestrians at unsignalized crossings

Abstract: Abstract-Interactions between vehicles and pedestrians have always been a major problem in traffic safety. Experienced human drivers are able to analyze the environment and choose driving strategies that will help them avoid crashes. What is not yet clear, however, is how automated vehicles will interact with pedestrians. This paper proposes a new method for evaluating the safety and feasibility of the driving strategy of automated vehicles when encountering unsignalized crossings. MobilEye ® sensors installed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…during encounters at unsignalized crossing (Chen et al 2017), to predict when a pedestrian will cross (Völz et al 2016), or to categorizing danger in vehiclepedestrian encounters (Otsuka et al 2017). Similar studies are also being performed for cyclists.…”
Section: Context Cues For Vru Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…during encounters at unsignalized crossing (Chen et al 2017), to predict when a pedestrian will cross (Völz et al 2016), or to categorizing danger in vehiclepedestrian encounters (Otsuka et al 2017). Similar studies are also being performed for cyclists.…”
Section: Context Cues For Vru Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple metrics are available to evaluate performance [9], [19]. We calculate the mean velocity v, the mean acceleration a, the mean collision velocity dv, the number of collisions, and the amount of emergency brake interventions, over all of the EuroNCAP scenarios.…”
Section: A Evaluation Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on evaluating autonomous braking systems at unsignalized crosswalks relied on datadriven models of the pedestrian [9]. Chen, Zhao, and Peng argue that the EuroNCAP scenarios would allow an overly conservative system to be validated [9]. To avoid such an issue, we augmented the suite of scenarios with a situation involving occluded areas at the side of the road with no pedestrian crossing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complex modeling of pedestrian behavior is left as future work. Previous work presents data driven approaches for modeling pedestrian behavior at crosswalk [6]. The agent receives a reward when reaching a terminal state.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%