Evaluation of Audit Expectation Gap in Sudan: Existence, Causes, and Subsequent Effects

Abstract

Purpose: This study mainly focus on evaluating the existence, causes and subsequent effects of audit expectation gap in Sudan.Proposed Design/Methodology/Approach: A cross sectional research design in which data to be collected through structured questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. Partial Least Square Path Modeling, using Smart PLS Software to analyze the data.Findings: A detailed literature review reveals that, there is a shortage of research concerning the impact of multi-responsibility auditor, standard external audit process, accounting and auditing regulations in a developing country, auditor independence in fact and in appearance, external audit rotation, and rendering of non-audit services on audit expectation gap.Moreover, there is dearth of studies investigating the moderating role of professional code of ethics, and the mediating effect of audit report .Therefore, the study proposes a framework to incorporate these factors into future research.Practical Implications: The results of this study will assist policy makers in finding ways that can be instituted to tackle expectation gap in Sudan, to improve the quality of the auditing profession in the country.Originality/value: This study contributes to the existing literature by adding evidence to the important debate about audit expectation gap, from a region that had little coverage on the studied matter. Specifically, it proposes a framework to extend the research on the factors that cause such a gap in Sudan. Moreover, a significant feature of this study is in introducing accounting and auditing regulations in a developing country as a new variable to investigate its effects on audit expectation gap.

The ability to reduce the expectation gap between financial reporting users and auditors: an analytical study of audit offices in Iraq

“…In 1993, Sikka pointed out that the expectation gap in auditing is due to the inability of some reporting users to understand the audit measures, and that the response of professional accounting bodies to this issue was done in two ways, first they discussed the need to re-educate users of financial reports regarding what the auditors are likely to do, and it is necessary to encourage financial reporting users to think about audi ting in the same way that they think, and the second response is to encourage the devices associated with the audit to understand the continuing gap in the audit process. Audit and not work to reduce that gap by reducing noise on communication between auditors and users of reports (Ghandour, 2019). In 1988, the American Institute of Chartered Accountants (AICPA) issued nine criteria for narrowing the forecast gap within the U.S. forecasting program (Furedi, 2017; Larsen, 2017), namely: • criteria no.…”

Auditing public schools' financial records: A study of financial management from the eyes of relevant stakeholders

“…Similarly, Gaye and Colley (2020) concur that the public's trust in the accuracy of the auditor's assessment and the efficacy of the audit are the foundations of the auditor function. Therefore, this theory of inspired confidence is a prerequisite for the existence of the auditing role of accountability, transparency and reliability in financial management (Ghandour, 2019). In the light of this, the purpose of this study is to learn about stakeholders' perspectives on auditors' functions and whether the auditors' reports meet their expectations and help improve school financial management.…”