Evaluation of Asymptomatic Bacteruria Management Before and After Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Implementation: Retrospective Study

Abstract

BackgroundThe Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends against screening for and/or treating asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). This study aims to evaluate the inappropriate use of antibiotics in ASB before and after Antimicrobial Stewardship Program implementation and advance towards its appropriate use. MethodWe performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ASB from 2016 to 2019 at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. This study included hospitalized patients ≥18 years old who had a positive urine culture with no signs or symptoms of urinary tract infection and were on antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria. We excluded pregnant women, solid organ transplant patients, patient on active chemotherapy, and patients about to undergo urological surgery.ResultsA total of 716 patients with a positive urine culture were screened . Among these, we identified 109 patients with ASB who were enrolled in our study. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic use was 95% during the study period. The implementation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program was associated with a significant reduction in the use of carbapenems (P = 0.04) and an increase in the use of cephalosporins (P = .099687). However, overprescribing antimicrobial agents was a concern in both eras. Approximately 90% of the microorganisms identified were gram-negative bacteria. Of those, 38.7% were multidrug-resistant strains. ConclusionThe urine culture order in ASB is considered relatively small number; however, it showed a high rate of the inappropriate use of antibiotics when there is an order of urine culture in both era. ASP ought to focus on targeting the ordering physician, promoting awareness and/or organizational interventions that appear to reduce the incidence of overtreatment.