2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-015-3048-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ASHFIK as Core-Based Routing Protocol for Critical MANETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, refreshing is very necessary for NSMP for group neighbors and forwarding nodes to operate correctly. Dynamic core-based multicast routing protocol (DCMP) [19] uses a cluster-based routing protocol. It decreases the flooding from the source node by selecting three types of senders, i.e., passive sender, active sender and core active sender.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, refreshing is very necessary for NSMP for group neighbors and forwarding nodes to operate correctly. Dynamic core-based multicast routing protocol (DCMP) [19] uses a cluster-based routing protocol. It decreases the flooding from the source node by selecting three types of senders, i.e., passive sender, active sender and core active sender.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the core node is selected as a leader, the receiver starts forming the mesh, and the core node maintains and updates the mesh. In PUMA [19], sources are not required to join the multicast group before any communication to the group recipient, and less delay and overhead is utilized [20]. In this approach, the core is selected within the group receivers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%