1992
DOI: 10.1016/0144-8609(92)90005-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of artificial intertidal enclosures for Gracilaria farming in southern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…chilensis Bravo et al (1992); Buschmann et al (1994a) Anderson et al (199V;Chiang (1981Chiang ( ,1992; Lipkin (1985); Santelices & Doty (1989) Edding et al (1987) …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…chilensis Bravo et al (1992); Buschmann et al (1994a) Anderson et al (199V;Chiang (1981Chiang ( ,1992; Lipkin (1985); Santelices & Doty (1989) Edding et al (1987) …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gracilaria chilensis seems to be able to utilize ammonium very efficiently in tank culture systems Buschmann et al ., 1994b) . However, enclosures installed in intertidal areas for Gracilaria cultivation do not require fertilization to maintain a high biomass production (Bravo et al ., 1992) . Furthermore, the results obtained in this study suggest that nutrients do not affect G. chilensis production, as no significant difference was recorded between dead and live mussel treatments .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason efforts have been made to look for alternative technologies. In intertidal systems Bravo et at (1992) have argued that intertidal enclosures can be installed in the high intertidal areas in which the seawater is exchanged twice daily by the tidal regime. Bravo et al (1992) obtained 30% higher biomass production than the traditional farmers in intertidal systems, with improved agar yield and tolerable epiphytism levels.…”
Section: Problems and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In intertidal systems Bravo et at (1992) have argued that intertidal enclosures can be installed in the high intertidal areas in which the seawater is exchanged twice daily by the tidal regime. Bravo et al (1992) obtained 30% higher biomass production than the traditional farmers in intertidal systems, with improved agar yield and tolerable epiphytism levels. As water replacement was carried out during high tidal periods, no pumping costs were incurred and fertilization W normally is used in similar cultivation systems (anisak, 1987) PREVALENCE ( was not necessary.…”
Section: Problems and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%