2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
349
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
349
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further supported by studies that correlate optimised antibiotic exposure with improved patient outcome [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This is further supported by studies that correlate optimised antibiotic exposure with improved patient outcome [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Dr. Roberts and colleagues suggested the use of trough concentrations as another PK-PD target at 4-5 × the concentration of the MIC for the pathogen and reported that the clinical success rate was 87.3% during beta-lactam TDM [25]. As observed by Dr. Roberts and colleagues, contrasting target values of %T > MIC were recently reported by some authors [26,27]. The very limited pertinent literature for beta-lactam TDM does not allow a direct comparison between our evaluation and those of previous trials; however, the results from the available reports and the present study are equivalent and suggest that beta-lactam TDM is useful to successfully personalize treatment.…”
Section: Dose Individualizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fT>MIC is lower for carbapenems because a more pronounced post-antibiotic effect is assumed for this substance class than for other substances [198]. These recommendations are derived from animal experiments; clinical investigations underscore the fact that in sepsis patients, an fT>MIC of 100% elicits a more effective anti-infective effect, and is thus relevant for outcome [190,[201][202][203]. Especially on the basis of striving to achieve adequate tissue concentrations even in deep-lying compartments (pneumonia; bone infections; infections of the central nervous system, CNS)-frequently in the context of disturbed microcirculation in sepsis patients [204][205][206] and also wishing to avoid development of resistance [207,208]-many experts recommend aiming for a concentration of β-lactam antibiotics in the primary compartment (serum/plasma) that exceeds the MIC by 4-times (up to 6-times) for 60-100% of the dosing interval [209].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%