2014
DOI: 10.5935/0100-4042.20140076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of antiradical assays used in determining the antioxidant capacity of pure compounds and plant extracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
24
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding can be explained by the difference in the sensitivity of the assays. It has been found that the DPPH radical reacts only with more reactive antioxidants as was found by de Olivera et al The reducing power of the PFCs studied was confirmed in the TAC assay, that once again showed the importance of both the CF 3 and OCH 3 groups in the benzene ring of the R substituent for capacity of the PF compounds to exhibit the antioxidant potency. We found that the reducing abilities of the PFCs evaluated were much weaker than trolox used as standard antiradical compound.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The finding can be explained by the difference in the sensitivity of the assays. It has been found that the DPPH radical reacts only with more reactive antioxidants as was found by de Olivera et al The reducing power of the PFCs studied was confirmed in the TAC assay, that once again showed the importance of both the CF 3 and OCH 3 groups in the benzene ring of the R substituent for capacity of the PF compounds to exhibit the antioxidant potency. We found that the reducing abilities of the PFCs evaluated were much weaker than trolox used as standard antiradical compound.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The obtained %Tx was 32 � 1% showing that the phases of M. floribundum were more active. [22] Analyzing the isolated compounds, flavones (1, 2) presented a low activity, less than 32 % Tx activity. However, chlorogenic acid derivatives (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) were more active than flavones showing higher ability to trapping DPPH radicals.…”
Section: Antiradical Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I 0 is the maximum CL intensity for standard and I is the maximum CL intensity for sample at t = 5 s after reaction initiation [28]. A calibration curve was constructed using Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic Acid, ≥98%, Merck KGaA, Germany) in the concentration range 8-168 M and the results were expressed as M Trolox equivalence [27].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Antioxidant and Antifungal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%