2014
DOI: 10.1111/2049-632x.12212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of antimicrobial treatment in a bovine model of acuteChlamydia psittaciinfection: tetracycline versus tetracycline plus rifampicin

Abstract: Antimicrobial treatment of chlamydial infections is known to be of limited efficacy. In this study, effects of doxycycline (D), usually the drug of choice, were compared with the combined therapy of doxycycline and rifampicin (R) in a bovine model of respiratory Chlamydia psittaci infection. After intrabronchial inoculation of the pathogen, 30 animals were assigned to five groups (n = 6 per group): untreated controls, monotherapy with D (5 mg kg(-1)day(-1) or 10 mg kg(-1)day(-1)), and combination therapy of D … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion of co-infections and standard antibiotic treatment after purchase, i.e. about 3 weeks before challenge, was performed as described previously [ 31 , 34 ]. Briefly, the presence of Mycoplasma , Pasteurella , or Mannheimia spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Exclusion of co-infections and standard antibiotic treatment after purchase, i.e. about 3 weeks before challenge, was performed as described previously [ 31 , 34 ]. Briefly, the presence of Mycoplasma , Pasteurella , or Mannheimia spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 13 infected animals in the present study had served as untreated controls in previous studies [ 31 , 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The infection model was very efficient, since all calves inoculated with the pathogen developed pneumonia, but none of the controls. The model was highly reproducible, and therefore repeatedly used to examine outcomes of different treatment regimens [23,24]. The localization of lesions corresponded to the inoculation sites and was distinct from field infections that have a cranioventral distribution [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%