2014
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2014.973999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of antibody response of killed and live vaccines against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in a field study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards to whether a killed or live injectable intramuscular PEDV vaccine generates sufficient immunity to PEDV in the sow, Paudel et al (2014) analyzed sows given one of four vaccine treatments: an unvaccinated negative control group, a killed virus vaccinated group with a killed virus booster (K/K), a live virus vaccinated group with a live virus booster (L/L) and a combination group given the live virus and a killed virus booster (L/K). All vaccinations including using live virus were given intramuscularly twice, at four and two weeks prior to farrowing.…”
Section: Vaccine Strategies To Prevent Epizootic Tgev and Pedvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In regards to whether a killed or live injectable intramuscular PEDV vaccine generates sufficient immunity to PEDV in the sow, Paudel et al (2014) analyzed sows given one of four vaccine treatments: an unvaccinated negative control group, a killed virus vaccinated group with a killed virus booster (K/K), a live virus vaccinated group with a live virus booster (L/L) and a combination group given the live virus and a killed virus booster (L/K). All vaccinations including using live virus were given intramuscularly twice, at four and two weeks prior to farrowing.…”
Section: Vaccine Strategies To Prevent Epizootic Tgev and Pedvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, while this study may provide information regarding vaccine immunogenicity, it does not reflect immune responses after live oral PEDV exposure. Additionally, PEDV challenge of piglets is necessary to determine if the K/K vaccine treatment also provides sufficient lactogenic immunity and piglet protection from disease (Paudel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Vaccine Strategies To Prevent Epizootic Tgev and Pedvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that PEDV infects its hosts primarily by directly invad-ing enterocytes lining the intestinal villi and the virus does not require systemic spread, it is likely that mucosal immunity, particularly secretory IgA, is responsible for virus neutralization and disease protection as opposed to the IgG predominantly found in sera of sows vaccinated via the parenteral route. Although PEDVspecific IgG may be present in high amounts in colostrum at parturition in sows intramuscularly vaccinated by PEDV live vaccines (Paudel et al, 2014), protection duration tends to be very short due to rapid decline of colostrum production in post-parturient sows (Klobasa et al, 1987).…”
Section: Challenges In Pedv Vaccine Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown recently that sows orally fed with intestinal homogenates obtained from clinically affected piglets exhibit significantly higher levels of milk anti-PEDV neutralizing antibodies compared to those intramuscularly immunized by the iPED+ vaccine (Scherba et al, 2016). Likewise, Paudel et al showed that oral administration of live attenuated PEDV strain DR-13 to pregnant sows reduces the mortality rate of nursing piglets (Paudel et al, 2014). A different study demonstrated that sows previously exposed to a mild strain of PEDV can passively transfer sufficient lactogenic immunity to piglets for protection against virulent PEDV exposure (Goede et al, 2015).…”
Section: Challenges In Pedv Vaccine Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of virulent PEDV strains in China during 2010, even in previously vaccinated farms, and in 2013 in the USA points to the necessity for more effective vaccines. Subunit or killed vaccines are only partially effective inducing mucosal immunity, although they could be suitable for boosting immunity in sows prior to farrowing (Oh et al, 2014; Paudel et al, 2014). Live vaccines are more effective inducing long-lasting immunity, although current live attenuated vaccines did not prevent virus shedding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%