2015
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity and Antioxidant Potential of Different Extracts from the Leaves of Juniperus Phoenicea

Abstract: Materials and Methods Materials Plant material: The leaves of Juniperus phoenicea ssp. phoenicea L, were collected from Al-Jabal Al Akhdar area in Benghazi, Libya (spring 2013). Bacteria used: Bacteria were taken from the laboratory of microbiology in Banghazi medical center ,which know as multi drag resistant bacteria .The bacteria used were Escherichia coli (MDR)ATCC, Staphylococcus aureus(MDR) ATCC , Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR) ATCC , Klebsiella pneumonia (MDR) and Acinetobacter sp (MDR). The organisms wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activity was highest at pure oil and was observed to decrease with concentration. This result was in accordance with previous studies which reported that bacterial strains were generally more sensitive to the essential oils than yeasts (Erkmen and Özcan, 2004;Helal et al, 2006;Obame et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This activity was highest at pure oil and was observed to decrease with concentration. This result was in accordance with previous studies which reported that bacterial strains were generally more sensitive to the essential oils than yeasts (Erkmen and Özcan, 2004;Helal et al, 2006;Obame et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The essential oil of J. phoenicea showed both, bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity only against the four Gram-positive strains, with diameter zone inhibition ranging from 13.1 mm (E. faecium) to 15.8 mm (S. aureus), and MIC values ranging from 0.5 μL/mL (S. aureus) to 15μL/mL (L. monocytogenes EGD-e) and MBC values of 10 μL/mL (S. aureus and L. monocytogenes 4b), 15 μL/mL (L. monocytogenes EGD-e), and 30 μL/mL (E. faecium). In other study, Ramdani et al (2013) Elmhdwi et al (2015) reported that J. phoenicea extracts (70% methanol, 70% ethanol and 70% acetone) at concentration of 20%, 30% and 40% were effective against both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gramnegative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia and Acinetobacter sp. ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is in accord with similar reports for juniper species from other regions (Elmastaş et al, 2006;Moein et al, 2010;Emami et al, 2011;Höferl et al, 2014;Cioanca et al, 2015;Elmhdwi et al, 2015). However, antioxidant activity as reported in this study did not correlate with the total content of phenolics and flavonoids, except for extracts obtained from cuttings of small seedlings, which shared the highest antioxidant activity with that of C2-type callus and in vitro shoots.…”
Section: Secondary Metabolites and Antioxidant Activitysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It could be that extraction with methanol was not the optimal choice. Elmhdwi et al (2015) showed that extraction of total phenols and flavonoids with 70% acetone in J. phoenicea gave better results than with 70% methanol or ethanol. They further elaborated that 70% acetone was more suitable for scavenging activity determination in J. phoenicea which resulted in higher reducing power.…”
Section: Secondary Metabolites and Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential oils from this plant exhibited moderate antibacterial and antifungal activities. [5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13] Elmhdwi et al 14 demonstrated that the extracts from J. phoenicea had antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria including multiple-drug-resistant (MDR) strains. This activity was attributed to the abundance of α-pinene and the overall chemical constituents of these extracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%