2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of anti-TNF therapeutic response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Current and novel biomarkers

Abstract: Neutralizing tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies have been widely used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the clinical practice. In this review, the principal biomarker analysis revealed that faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, serum or mucosal concentrations of anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibodies to anti-TNF mAbs are commonly used as current biomarkers in the evaluation of anti-TNF therapeutic efficacy. However, mucosal cytokine transcripts. microRNAs, proteomics and faecal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the detection of gene biomarkers with the potential capability of differentiating non-responders from responders to anti-TNF therapy is clearly an unmet need in the management of CD at present. Several clinical biomarkers, which serve as reproducible as well as quantitative tools to assess therapeutic efficacy during anti-TNF therapy, have been previously investigated in IBD patients, including C-reactive proteins, faecal calprotectins, and anti-TNF drug levels [ 9 ]. However, at present, no clinical predictors exist that predict the anti-TNF therapy response at baseline prior to its application, even though preemptive prediction can serve to be more meaningful in the individualised management of CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, the detection of gene biomarkers with the potential capability of differentiating non-responders from responders to anti-TNF therapy is clearly an unmet need in the management of CD at present. Several clinical biomarkers, which serve as reproducible as well as quantitative tools to assess therapeutic efficacy during anti-TNF therapy, have been previously investigated in IBD patients, including C-reactive proteins, faecal calprotectins, and anti-TNF drug levels [ 9 ]. However, at present, no clinical predictors exist that predict the anti-TNF therapy response at baseline prior to its application, even though preemptive prediction can serve to be more meaningful in the individualised management of CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, few methods based solely on clinical parameters and disease activity scores have been suggested to study the response to anti-TNF therapy in CD. Furthermore, they do not yield the required efficacy, even for a baseline primary response [ 9 ]. Therefore, a clear understanding of their resistance mechanisms and the pre-treatment assessment of anti-TNF therapy responsiveness in CD are critical for patients who may be susceptible to severe adverse effects of the drug that they may not benefit from, their families, and healthcare systems that endure the additional economic liability due to poor disease outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fecal calprotectin is commonly used for monitoring the response to treatment and healing of the intestinal mucosa [38,39]. In the only previous study examining the effect of biologic therapy for IBD on salivary parameters, Majster et al [40] compared calprotectin levels in saliva before and after therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many data on biomarkers that are expected to be used in the daily clinical practice of IBD have accumulated [157,158]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a singlestranded RNA of about 21 to 25 bases that negatively regulates gene expression [159].…”
Section: Novel Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%