2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1171-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of angiographic computed tomography in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms—a comparative study with DSA and TOF-MRA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
26
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All these technical aspects of ACT make it an application of potentially great importance during or after neurointerventional procedures. [8][9][10] In our study, we included 84 ACTs acquired on a biplane angiography scanner, during or immediately after a neuroendovascular procedure, in the period of 2006 -2009. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of ACT in peri-interventional imaging and, particularly, in the detection and progress of hemorrhage or hydrocephalus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these technical aspects of ACT make it an application of potentially great importance during or after neurointerventional procedures. [8][9][10] In our study, we included 84 ACTs acquired on a biplane angiography scanner, during or immediately after a neuroendovascular procedure, in the period of 2006 -2009. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of ACT in peri-interventional imaging and, particularly, in the detection and progress of hemorrhage or hydrocephalus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSA is the gold standard for follow-up of UIAs after endovascular treatment (20). CT angiography and MR angiography can be utilized, however both are inferior to DSA for detection of residue or recurrence of the aneurysm (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These images can identify the relationship of the metal implants and provide early recognition of rebleeding or intracranial procedure-related complications, such as incomplete stent deployment, stent migration, stent fracture, or coil dislocation. [12][13][14] However, the metallic artifacts stemming from metal objects hinder clear visualization of a hematoma or parenchyma surrounding metal objects. 14 Prell et al 15 demonstrated successfully reducing metal artifacts by using their version of a MAR algorithm in a small series of 7 patients who had cerebral aneurysms and were treated with coiling or clipping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%