2022
DOI: 10.2478/contagri-2022-0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of and Variability in Yields and Yield Components of Wheat Cultivars in Northern Serbia

Abstract: Summary The purpose of this research is to examine the variability in yields and yield components of wheat cultivars in Northern Serbia, examine and visualize their groupings and relationships, and determine the correlations between their traits using principal components analysis (PCA). A total of fifteen wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.), developed in 10 different countries over a period exceeding 70 years, were analyzed during the growing seasons of 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 at Rimski šanč… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Serbian researchers, differences in the genotypes of plant varieties of different origin and the period of their vegetation affect the beginning of certain phases of development, therefore, some varieties are less susceptible to the influence of weather conditions, since their phenophase, unlike other varieties, does not fall under the strong influence of extreme climatic factors in the cultivation region [30][31][32]. Similar results were obtained in the course of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to Serbian researchers, differences in the genotypes of plant varieties of different origin and the period of their vegetation affect the beginning of certain phases of development, therefore, some varieties are less susceptible to the influence of weather conditions, since their phenophase, unlike other varieties, does not fall under the strong influence of extreme climatic factors in the cultivation region [30][31][32]. Similar results were obtained in the course of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%