“…The mid‐height of the specimen was chosen for ultrasonic imaging, as this region is least sensitive to the constraints applied at the specimen ends by the loading platens, and hence is more representative of the specimen deformation (Tang & Hudson, 2010). This is also consistent with the laboratory‐scale setup employed in several studies on the ultrasonic‐based characterization of rock damage, for example, Jones (1952), Gupta (1973), Lockner et al (1977), Sayers et al (1990), Wulff et al (1999), Fortin et al (2007), Luong (2009), Ghazvinian (2015), and Shirole et al (2017), Shirole, Walton, Ostrovksy, Masoumi et al (2018), Shirole, Walton, Ostrovsky, Hossein et al (2018), Shirole et al (2019a, 2019b), Shirole, Hedayat et al (2020). Compressional P‐wave ultrasonic pulses with a period of 1 μs were transmitted and reflected through the specimen, for which Videoscan longitudinal wave transducers (V‐103; diameter of 13 mm and central frequency of 1 MHz) from Olympus NDT, Inc. were used.…”