2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02045-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Ultrasonic Method for Damage Characterization of Brittle Rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mid‐height of the specimen was chosen for ultrasonic imaging, as this region is least sensitive to the constraints applied at the specimen ends by the loading platens, and hence is more representative of the specimen deformation (Tang & Hudson, 2010). This is also consistent with the laboratory‐scale setup employed in several studies on the ultrasonic‐based characterization of rock damage, for example, Jones (1952), Gupta (1973), Lockner et al (1977), Sayers et al (1990), Wulff et al (1999), Fortin et al (2007), Luong (2009), Ghazvinian (2015), and Shirole et al (2017), Shirole, Walton, Ostrovksy, Masoumi et al (2018), Shirole, Walton, Ostrovsky, Hossein et al (2018), Shirole et al (2019a, 2019b), Shirole, Hedayat et al (2020). Compressional P‐wave ultrasonic pulses with a period of 1 μs were transmitted and reflected through the specimen, for which Videoscan longitudinal wave transducers (V‐103; diameter of 13 mm and central frequency of 1 MHz) from Olympus NDT, Inc. were used.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mid‐height of the specimen was chosen for ultrasonic imaging, as this region is least sensitive to the constraints applied at the specimen ends by the loading platens, and hence is more representative of the specimen deformation (Tang & Hudson, 2010). This is also consistent with the laboratory‐scale setup employed in several studies on the ultrasonic‐based characterization of rock damage, for example, Jones (1952), Gupta (1973), Lockner et al (1977), Sayers et al (1990), Wulff et al (1999), Fortin et al (2007), Luong (2009), Ghazvinian (2015), and Shirole et al (2017), Shirole, Walton, Ostrovksy, Masoumi et al (2018), Shirole, Walton, Ostrovsky, Hossein et al (2018), Shirole et al (2019a, 2019b), Shirole, Hedayat et al (2020). Compressional P‐wave ultrasonic pulses with a period of 1 μs were transmitted and reflected through the specimen, for which Videoscan longitudinal wave transducers (V‐103; diameter of 13 mm and central frequency of 1 MHz) from Olympus NDT, Inc. were used.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative square pulse (300 V) produced by a pulse generator from Olympus NDT, Inc. every 200 μs served as the active source of the compressional ultrasonic signals (in both T‐mode and R‐mode). The T‐mode and R‐mode ultrasonic signals were digitized at a sampling frequency of 100 MHz and were acquired near‐continuously at 1 Hz (for details, refer to Shirole et al, 2017, and Shirole, Hedayat et al, 2020). For R‐mode LUT, the source transducer acted as both the source and receiver of the reflected ultrasonic signals, whereas in T‐mode, the source and receiver transducers performed as the source and receiver of the transmitted ultrasonic signals, respectively (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods comprise destructive methods involving load testing under different loading conditions [11,12] and semi-destructive mechanical tests with simultaneous measurement of acoustic emission [13,14]. Non-destructive in situ and laboratory methods for inspecting natural materials are addressed in [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], including thermal control [16][17][18][19][20], multispectral optical remote sensing [21], ground penetrating radar [22,23], ultrasonic inspection [25,26], gamma-ray logging [27], terahertz spectroscopy [28], X-ray tomography [29,30], neutron radiography [31], and others [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would be more efficient to use this method together with ultrasonic diagnostics so as to comprehensively assess the condition and internal structure of geomaterials. Conventional ultrasonic flaw detectors and tomographs operate, as a rule, at a certain resonance frequency [24][25][26], which makes it difficult to determine the geometry and location of different-scale defects. The use of piezoelectric transducers exciting and receiving broadband ultrasonic signals results in a sharp decrease in radiated power and a significant decrease in sensitivity, which means that the dynamic range becomes narrower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%