2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an open-source pipeline to create patient-specific left atrial models: A reproducibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, a wide range of automated anatomical model creation workflows based on machine learning have been proposed allowing large-scale population analysis such as on the UK Biobank dataset 1,23,24 , however, these models only account for surfaces depicting the overall heart structure, but not high-quality volumetric meshes. There are also volumetric mesh creation workflows existing for atria 25,26 , ventricles 12 and whole hearts 11,27 , but these have only been applied to smaller datasets (<100) due to the high computational costs and manual steps required. Here we reported a fully automated volumetric mesh generation workflow that can create personalized anatomical meshes at scale within clinical timescales (∼5 minutes/CDT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a wide range of automated anatomical model creation workflows based on machine learning have been proposed allowing large-scale population analysis such as on the UK Biobank dataset 1,23,24 , however, these models only account for surfaces depicting the overall heart structure, but not high-quality volumetric meshes. There are also volumetric mesh creation workflows existing for atria 25,26 , ventricles 12 and whole hearts 11,27 , but these have only been applied to smaller datasets (<100) due to the high computational costs and manual steps required. Here we reported a fully automated volumetric mesh generation workflow that can create personalized anatomical meshes at scale within clinical timescales (∼5 minutes/CDT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraclass correlation (ICC) has long been recognized as a vital reliability and reproducibility metric, especially for gauging similarity in paired data when the order of pairing is not preserved [96,106,107]. In brain imaging, it serves as a popular baseline for test-retest (TRT) reliability assessments, often in conjunction with the Dice coefficient [108][109][110][111][112].…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ventricular fibres can also be mapped from a geometry with a known fibre orientation using universal ventricular coordinates [ 80 ], a set of coordinates that uniquely define a point within a biventricular anatomy independently of the geometry. Similarly, universal atrial coordinates have been used to map ex-vivo DT-MRI fibres from an atlas onto patient-specific biatrial anatomies [ 59 , 60 , 81 ]. An example is shown in the right side of the second row of Figure 2 .…”
Section: Anatomical Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%