2009
DOI: 10.1080/15228830802462063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Online Peer Support Network for Adolescents with Chronic Kidney Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In many ways, this shared network functioned like an online support group, where sharing experiences helped the young people to define a unique support network they could not access in their daily lives [27]. As in a formalized support group, youth shared common experiences to establish a common group identity [29] and set limits of group membership and appropriate behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many ways, this shared network functioned like an online support group, where sharing experiences helped the young people to define a unique support network they could not access in their daily lives [27]. As in a formalized support group, youth shared common experiences to establish a common group identity [29] and set limits of group membership and appropriate behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying support groups versus the support environment Another concern with social support research has been the frequent study of individual support groups (for example, Uccelli et al, 2004;Shu and Lung, 2005;Nicholas et al, 2009;Percy et al, 2009). Although studying support groups in isolation is good for understanding how a group works, studying support in this way does not take into account an individual's social network that exists beyond the borders of the group.…”
Section: Deficiencies In Social Support Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Social support has been studied extensively, but unfortunately there is no clear understanding of how the social support process works for people with chronic health conditions. Researchers have conducted numerous descriptive studies that identified the types of support messages constructed in support groups (Braithwaite et al, 1999;Eichhorn, 2008;Ginossar, 2008;Qian and Mao, 2010), and have uncovered empirical evidence that social support yields positive emotional and social health benefits (Eysenbach et al, 2004;Nicholas et al, 2009;Fukkink, 2011) and physical health benefits (House et al, 1988;Uchino, 2006;Goldsmith and Albrect, 2011, p.337).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The respondents identified several positive aspects (e.g., anonymity and time flexibil ity), and several negative aspects, (e.g., no ability to receive physical comfort and the lack of contextual cues; Colvin et al, 2004). Another study examining the online support of adolescents with chronic kidney disease found a mixture of positive (e.g., connecting geographically dispersed individuals with shared experiences) and negative (e.g., the diverse ages limited cohesion and shared inter ests; Nicholas et al, 2009). In addition, Eichhorn (2008) found constructive and useful support to be solicited and received in her investigation of online eating disorder support groups.…”
Section: Internet Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%