Abstract:The inaccuracy of 17-β estradiol (E2) measurements affects its use as a biomarker in patient care and research. Clinical and research communities called for accurate and standardized E2 measurements. Reference Measurement Procedures (RMPs), part of the CDC Hormone Standardization Program (HoSt), are essential in addressing this need and ensuring that methods are accurate and comparable across testing systems, laboratories, and over time. A candidate RMP (cRMP) was developed for the measurement of total E2 in s… Show more
“…ME. ME was evaluated in three matrices (charcoal-stripped serum, male serum and female serum) and one set of neat samples in methanol (matrix-free), according to previous studies (21,22). A 7-point calibration curve ranging from 10-1,000 ng/dl for testosterone was prepared in each matrix.…”
Section: Uplc-ms/ms Conditions For the Chromatographic Assaymentioning
Quantification of testosterone serves an important role in the differential diagnosis of androgen-related endocrine diseases. Mass spectrometry exhibits higher accuracy and lower variability than immunoassays, especially at low testosterone concentrations. The present study developed and validated an isotope dilution ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of human serum testosterone. The serum was equilibrated with an isotopic internal standard and treated with acidic buffer to release hormones from their binding proteins. Testosterone was extracted via two serial liquid-liquid extractions. In the first stage, the lipid fractions from an acidic buffer solution were isolated using ethyl acetate and n-hexane. The organic phase was evaporated and reconstituted in a basic buffer solution. In the second stage, the polar impurities of n-hexane extraction were removed. Total testosterone in serum was quantified via ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode with positive electrospray ionization. The coefficient of variation of the method for intra-and inter-assay was 2.13% (1.40-2.77%) and 3.44% (3.06-3.66%), respectively. The recovery ranged from 94.32 to 108.60% for different samples. The limit of detection was 0.50 ng/dl and the linear range was from 1.00 to 1,000.00 ng/dl. In addition, the extraction efficiency in three different levels of quality control of the serum ranged from 85.02 to 93.29%. Moreover, structural analogues were investigated and were not indicated to affect the quantification of testosterone. The present method may enable quantification of testosterone in a clinical setting with high precision and accuracy.
“…ME. ME was evaluated in three matrices (charcoal-stripped serum, male serum and female serum) and one set of neat samples in methanol (matrix-free), according to previous studies (21,22). A 7-point calibration curve ranging from 10-1,000 ng/dl for testosterone was prepared in each matrix.…”
Section: Uplc-ms/ms Conditions For the Chromatographic Assaymentioning
Quantification of testosterone serves an important role in the differential diagnosis of androgen-related endocrine diseases. Mass spectrometry exhibits higher accuracy and lower variability than immunoassays, especially at low testosterone concentrations. The present study developed and validated an isotope dilution ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of human serum testosterone. The serum was equilibrated with an isotopic internal standard and treated with acidic buffer to release hormones from their binding proteins. Testosterone was extracted via two serial liquid-liquid extractions. In the first stage, the lipid fractions from an acidic buffer solution were isolated using ethyl acetate and n-hexane. The organic phase was evaporated and reconstituted in a basic buffer solution. In the second stage, the polar impurities of n-hexane extraction were removed. Total testosterone in serum was quantified via ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode with positive electrospray ionization. The coefficient of variation of the method for intra-and inter-assay was 2.13% (1.40-2.77%) and 3.44% (3.06-3.66%), respectively. The recovery ranged from 94.32 to 108.60% for different samples. The limit of detection was 0.50 ng/dl and the linear range was from 1.00 to 1,000.00 ng/dl. In addition, the extraction efficiency in three different levels of quality control of the serum ranged from 85.02 to 93.29%. Moreover, structural analogues were investigated and were not indicated to affect the quantification of testosterone. The present method may enable quantification of testosterone in a clinical setting with high precision and accuracy.
“…Though a higher pH would increase the removal of these polar compounds (21), the pH of 8.0 was selected to be 2 pH units below the pKA of E2 (10.5). This avoids deprotonation and subsequent decrease in recovery of estradiol (29, 45). Repeating the entire two-step LLE procedure yielded in a higher extraction efficiency of 70% for E2 (95%CI: 67–72%) and 72% for TT (95%CI: 70–75%), compared to 43% for E2 (95%CI: 40–46%) and 44% for TT (95%CI: 43–46%) with only one extraction.…”
Section: 0 Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agreement of the measured value with the assigned target value of the reference materials was assessed as described in NIST Special Publication 829 (24). In addition, measurement bias was evaluated following CLSI document EP9-A2 (25) using 40 single-donor serum materials with reference values assigned by higher-order reference methods listed in the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) database (NIST (26), University of Ghent (27, 28), and CDC Reference Laboratory (29, 30). The accuracy of the method was monitored over 2 years by measuring 10 blinded serum samples quarterly for each analyte with reference values assigned by higher-order reference methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, specificity was assessed by monitoring the QI/CI ratios in regular serum samples. A difference of more than ± 20% from the established target ratio was used to indicate the presence of an interfering compound (21, 23, 29, 34). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample matrix effects (ME) were assessed on four matrices (0.9% saline solution, synthetic serum, male serum, and female serum) and one set of neat samples in ethanol (matrix-free) using previously described procedures (29). An 8-point calibration curve ranging from 33.0–3670 pM (9–1000 pg/mL) for E2 and 0.31–34.7 nM (9–1000 ng/dL) for TT were prepared in each matrix.…”
Reliable measurement of total testosterone and estradiol is critical for their use as biomarkers of hormone related disorders in patient care and translation research. We developed and validated a mass spectrometry method to simultaneously quantify these analytes in human serum without chemical derivatization. Serum is equilibrated with isotopic internal standards and treated with acidic buffer to release hormones from their binding proteins. Lipids are isolated and polar impurities are removed by two serial liquid-liquid extraction steps. Total testosterone and estradiol are measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in combination of positive and negative electrospray ionization modes. The method shows broad analytical measurement range for both testosterone 0.03–48.5 nM (0.75–1400 ng/dL) and estradiol 11.0–5138 pM (2.99–1400 pg/mL) and excellent agreement with certified reference materials (mean bias less than 2.1% to SRM 971, BCR 576, 577, and 578) and a high order reference method (mean bias 1.25% for testosterone and −0.84% for estradiol). The high accuracy of the method was monitored and certified by CDC Hormone Standardization (HoSt) Program for two years with mean bias −0.7% (95%CI: −1.6% to 0.2%) for testosterone and 0.1% (95%CI: −2.2% to 2.3%) for estradiol. The method precision over a 2-year period for Quality Control pools at low, medium and high concentrations was 2.7–2.9% for testosterone and 3.3–5.3% for estradiol. With the consistently excellent accuracy and precision, this method is readily applicable for high-throughput clinical and epidemiological studies.
BackgroundAccurate quantification of 17‐hydroxyprogesterone (17‐OHP) in serum is vital for clinical and research applications. However, inter‐laboratory variability in test results exists owing to the lack of a standardized reference measurement procedure (RMP). Therefore, in this study, we developed a highly accurate, cost‐effective, and user‐friendly candidate RMP (cRMP) for analyzing 17‐OHP in serum.MethodsWe quantified 17‐OHP in serum using a one‐step liquid–liquid extraction method with the addition of 17‐OHP‐13C3, followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The ability of these methods to suppress interference was evaluated by chromatographic analysis. We assessed accuracy, specificity, the lower limit of quantitation, linearity, and matrix effects by following the standards specified by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The consistency between the developed cRMP and the chemiluminescence method was evaluated through experiments with 120 clinical samples.ResultsThe developed cRMP required only 8 min for accurate quantification of serum 17‐OHP without bias from matrix effects or interference from 19 metabolites added as potential interferents. The method exhibited favorable measurement performance, with a quantitation limit of 0.086 ng/mL, linear range of 0.1–400 ng/mL, a total imprecision of ≤2.90%, spike recovery of 100.1%–100.6%, and relative deviations from assigned target values (RfB Institution) of −2.91% to 1.10%. The cRMP demonstrated good consistency with the conventional assay (chemiluminescence method), with a correlation coefficient R of 0.96977.ConclusionA cRMP with high accuracy, cost‐effectiveness, and convenient operation was developed for quantifying 17‐OHP in serum. Its simplicity and robust performance make it an invaluable addition to the arsenal of analytical tools available for laboratories. This method can enhance the accuracy and reliability of 17‐OHP measurements across various laboratories.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.