2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2148694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Isosceles-Triangle-Coil Phantom for Magnetoencephalography

Abstract: In recent years, many kinds of magnetic sensors have been developed for biomagnetic measurement, such as magnetocardiography (MCG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). However, it is difficult to evaluate their performance using only actual MCG or MEG measurements. In this paper, we propose the use of the calibrated MEG phantom for quantitative evaluation of magnetic sensors and present the experimental method. We choose a magneto-impedance (MI) sensor as an example of the magnetic sensor to be evaluated. The mag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify localization accuracy of the MEG system, measurements were made using a custom-built current dipole phantom. We designed a “dry phantom” [21], which uses wire triangles to generate short tangential current segments at known positions and orientations. Figures 1b and 1c show the phantom, which consists of a platform and clamps, an arc, and dipole clips.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify localization accuracy of the MEG system, measurements were made using a custom-built current dipole phantom. We designed a “dry phantom” [21], which uses wire triangles to generate short tangential current segments at known positions and orientations. Figures 1b and 1c show the phantom, which consists of a platform and clamps, an arc, and dipole clips.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEG measurements are made as the wire segments are activated, and the calculated and known positions are compared to establish variability and bias. Previous phantom studies establish the localization accuracy of MEG recordings at 1-5 mm with no systematic bias, using a range of phantom designs and current dipole positions and orientations [10,[20][21][22][23]. However, phantom design, fabrication and calibration is challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify localization accuracy of the MEG system, measurements were made using a custom-built current dipole phantom. We designed a “dry phantom” [ 17 ], which uses wire triangles to generate short tangential current segments at known positions and orientations. Figure 1 b,c show the phantom, which consists of a platform and clamps, an arc, and dipole clips.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEG measurements are made as the wire segments are activated, and the calculated and known positions are compared to establish variability and bias. Previous phantom studies established the localization accuracy of MEG recordings at 1–5 mm with no systematic bias, using a range of phantom designs and current dipole positions and orientations [ 5 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. However, phantom design, fabrication and calibration is challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field has to produce a measurable signal at the sensor which is typically a magnetometer or a gradiometer. For high precision, so-called isosceles-triangular-coil phantoms may be applied, but their structure has to be crafted to precision better than 1 mm, with more than one electromagnet [5]. An array of small circular coils on a sphere can also be used for a successful calibration [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%