Evaluation of an ICF‐based patient education programme for stroke patients: A randomized, single‐blinded, controlled, multicentre trial of the effects on self‐efficacy, life satisfaction and functioning

Sabariego, Carla; Barrera, Andrea Eugenia; Neubert, Silvia; Stier-Jarmer, Marita; Bostan, Cristina; Cieza, Alarcos

doi:10.1111/bjhp.12013

Cited by 24 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 51 publications

(67 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, several studies included in this review suggest a sustained effect beyond this time period. 8,25,32,37 Patient-centered discharge tools in which patients were engaged in the design or the delivery were found to improve comprehension of but not adherence with discharge instructions. The perceived lack of improved adherence may be due to a lack of studies that measured the usefulness and utilization of information for patients once at home.…”

Section: Total References 4015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Patient‐Centered Discharge Tools: A Systematic Review

Okrainec

Lau

Abrams

et al. 2017

Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered discharge tools provide an opportunity to engage patients, enhance patient understanding, and improve capacity for self-care and postdischarge outcomes. PURPOSE:To review studies that engaged patients in the design or delivery of discharge instruction tools and that tested their effect among hospitalized patients. DATA SOURCES:We conducted a search of 12 databases and journals from January 1994 through May 2014, and references of retrieved studies.STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies that tested discharge tools meant to engage patients were selected. Studies that measured outcomes after 3 months or without a control group or period were excluded.DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers assessed the full-text papers and extracted data on features of patient engagement.

show abstract

Section: Total References 4015mentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Patient‐Centered Discharge Tools: A Systematic Review

Okrainec

Lau

Abrams

et al. 2017

Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ [72] to 380 [55,72]; just under half of trials (11) [58,59,63,67,72,75], three studies chose measures of selfefficacy [53,54,74,79], one study chose a measure of depression as their primary outcome measure [73] and one study chose to measure proactive coping [77].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most common theoretical rationale for interventions was self-efficacy theory which was cited in nine studies [53,54,[57][58][59][60]66,68,69,71,74]. Other theoretical rationales included control cognitions theory (two studies) [62,67], Wagner's chronic care model (two studies) [55,56] and the psychosocial model (one study) [63].…”

Section: Intervention Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The majority of studies (14 out of 24) delivered general self-management interventions which focused upon teaching stroke survivors multiple skills such as coping, planning and goalsetting to improve general quality of life [57,[60][61][62][63][66][67][68][69][70][71]74,77,79]. Five of the 24 selfmanagement interventions identified were occupational therapy-based interventions which focused upon stroke survivors regaining the skills to perform activities of daily living [58,59,64,65,72,75,76].…”

Section: Intervention Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…14 out of 24 studies scored high risk of bias in at least one domain [56,58,59,61,62,66,[68][69][70][71][72][73][74]76,79].…”

Section: [Table 2: Risk Of Bias]mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia

Wray

Clarke

Forster

2017

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robust conclusions regarding the effectiveness of poststroke self-management approaches could not be drawn. Further trials are needed, these should clearly report the population included. Implications for rehabilitation There is a lack of evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of self-management approaches for stroke survivors. It is unclear whether self-management approaches are suitable for stroke survivors with aphasia, particularly those with moderate or severe aphasia. Further research is needed to understand the optimal timing for self-management in the stroke pathway and the format in which self-management support should be offered.

show abstract

Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers

Crocker

Brown

Lam

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The health risks associated with moderate alcohol consumption continue to be debated. Small amounts of alcohol might lower the risk of some health outcomes but increase the risk of others, suggesting that the overall risk depends, in part, on background disease rates, which vary by region, age, sex, and year.Methods For this analysis, we constructed burden-weighted dose-response relative risk curves across 22 health outcomes to estimate the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL) and non-drinker equivalence (NDE), the consumption level at which the health risk is equivalent to that of a non-drinker, using disease rates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2020 for 21 regions, including 204 countries and territories, by 5-year age group, sex, and year for individuals aged 15-95 years and older from 1990 to 2020. Based on the NDE, we quantified the population consuming harmful amounts of alcohol. Findings The burden-weighted relative risk curves for alcohol use varied by region and age. Among individuals aged 15-39 years in 2020, the TMREL varied between 0 (95% uncertainty interval 0-0) and 0•603 (0•400-1•00) standard drinks per day, and the NDE varied between 0•002 (0-0) and 1•75 (0•698-4•30) standard drinks per day. Among individuals aged 40 years and older, the burden-weighted relative risk curve was J-shaped for all regions, with a 2020 TMREL that ranged from 0•114 (0-0•403) to 1•87 (0•500-3•30) standard drinks per day and an NDE that ranged between 0•193 (0-0•900) and 6•94 (3•40-8•30) standard drinks per day. Among individuals consuming harmful amounts of alcohol in 2020, 59•1% (54•3-65•4) were aged 15-39 years and 76•9% (73•0-81•3) were male. Interpretation There is strong evidence to support recommendations on alcohol consumption varying by age and location. Stronger interventions, particularly those tailored towards younger individuals, are needed to reduce the substantial global health loss attributable to alcohol. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

show abstract

Evaluation of an ICF‐based patient education programme for stroke patients: A randomized, single‐blinded, controlled, multicentre trial of the effects on self‐efficacy, life satisfaction and functioning

Cited by 24 publications

References 51 publications

Impact of Patient‐Centered Discharge Tools: A Systematic Review

Impact of Patient‐Centered Discharge Tools: A Systematic Review

Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia

Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About