2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an HIV recent infection testing algorithm with serological assays among men who have sex with men in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study showed that FRR was reduced from 4.9% to 0.4% when VL was incorporated into an algorithm initially consisting of the recency assay and CD4+ T cell count. (Karatzas-Delgado et al, 2020) This study conducted in Mexico also showed that the FRR could be largely reduced when combined with clinical information. (Karatzas-Delgado et al, 2020) This study showed that using the recency assay only, using the recency assay with CD4+ T cell count, using the recency assay with VL, and using the recency assay with both CD4+ T cell count and VL had different FRR of 5.4%, 4.9%, 0.4%, and 0%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study showed that FRR was reduced from 4.9% to 0.4% when VL was incorporated into an algorithm initially consisting of the recency assay and CD4+ T cell count. (Karatzas-Delgado et al, 2020) This study conducted in Mexico also showed that the FRR could be largely reduced when combined with clinical information. (Karatzas-Delgado et al, 2020) This study showed that using the recency assay only, using the recency assay with CD4+ T cell count, using the recency assay with VL, and using the recency assay with both CD4+ T cell count and VL had different FRR of 5.4%, 4.9%, 0.4%, and 0%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…(Karatzas-Delgado et al, 2020) This study conducted in Mexico also showed that the FRR could be largely reduced when combined with clinical information. (Karatzas-Delgado et al, 2020) This study showed that using the recency assay only, using the recency assay with CD4+ T cell count, using the recency assay with VL, and using the recency assay with both CD4+ T cell count and VL had different FRR of 5.4%, 4.9%, 0.4%, and 0%, respectively. Therefore, among the four RITAs in our analysis, RITA 4, which combines the LAg-Avidity EIA assay with CD4+ T cell count and VL, will be the most accurate in classifying recent HIV infection cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study shows the HIV incidence from MSM at the national and regional levels, and this data was not collected only from local surveys or by only including the general population. For this work, we considered the use of the RITA algorithm and a specific FRR for correction, as recommended by the World Health Organization [ 5 , 12 ]. A publication by Hallett T. in 2011 showed that none of 39 studies analysed corrected the results or data obtained from other populations or regions by a specific FRR; consequently, the incidence estimations may contain errors [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To classify recent infections, we first generated an algorithm that included the HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay, information about antiretroviral therapy (ART), and BED EIA HIV-1 test results. To estimate the incidence, we used recent HIV infections and the formula proposed by Hargrove et al with a 1.3% correction factor (FRR) previously obtained for MSM from Mexico City for DBS samples and the BED EIA HIV-1 test [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%