2022
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an empirical equation to compute the nonlinearity parameter of a root water uptake model

Abstract: The study evaluates an empirical equation to compute the nonlinearity parameter ‘β’ of a root water uptake (RWU) model for a variety of crops. A numerical model for simulating the soil moisture dynamics incorporating the RWU model was used to evaluate the efficacy of the empirical equation. Field experiments on seven crops, namely maize, pea, wheat, sorghum, Indian mustard, guar and potato, were conducted at Hamirpur, India. The soil moisture depletion and moisture status at different depths in the crop root z… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) To conduct a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing optimal irrigation scheduling and water management practices (2) To gain insight into AI and ML algorithms used for irrigation scheduling predictive models.…”
Section: Objectives Of Review Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) To conduct a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing optimal irrigation scheduling and water management practices (2) To gain insight into AI and ML algorithms used for irrigation scheduling predictive models.…”
Section: Objectives Of Review Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]) is essential to guaranteeing that water is used as efficiently as possible to maximize crop yield and minimize water waste. Conventional irrigation scheduling techniques frequently depend on empirical methodologies, which might not be as flexible in response to shifting crop needs and environmental conditions (Kumar, N. et al (2024). [2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation