1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00063-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an ELISA for detection of antibodies to Babesia bovis in cattle in Australia and Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the IFAT method is in disagreement with the ELISA and EIS tests for two out of the four samples tested (Table 2). These results are not unexpected given the subjective nature of the IFAT test [4,7], and the fact that both, ELISA and EIS were designed for detecting only specific antibodies against the rRAP-1/CT-STR antigen. Therefore, although the results suggest that EIS could also be used as a method for the detection of antibodies in cattle samples using B. bovis rRAP-1/CT-STR protein immobilized on gold substrate, more field cattle serum samples needs to be analysed in future work comparing these three antibody detection methods using an statistically validated design.…”
Section: Detection Of Antibodies Against B Bovis Rrap-1/ct-str Protementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the IFAT method is in disagreement with the ELISA and EIS tests for two out of the four samples tested (Table 2). These results are not unexpected given the subjective nature of the IFAT test [4,7], and the fact that both, ELISA and EIS were designed for detecting only specific antibodies against the rRAP-1/CT-STR antigen. Therefore, although the results suggest that EIS could also be used as a method for the detection of antibodies in cattle samples using B. bovis rRAP-1/CT-STR protein immobilized on gold substrate, more field cattle serum samples needs to be analysed in future work comparing these three antibody detection methods using an statistically validated design.…”
Section: Detection Of Antibodies Against B Bovis Rrap-1/ct-str Protementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Acute infections are usually diagnosed by microscopic examination of blood smears, whereas subclinical chronic infections can be identified serologically [2]. In addition, the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) is one of the most commonly used methods for the diagnosis of B. bovis infection [3,4] and has been applied in epidemiological studies in a number of countries [5,6], but IFAT was rendered cumbersome and subjective [4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological assays are currently most likely to meet these requirements, as B. bovis infection finally leads to an asymptomatic carrier animal state in which the parasite commonly escapes direct detection by PCR, reverse line blot hybridization (RLB), or Giemsa-stained blood smears (10,23). A number of serological methods have been established for the detection of B. bovis-specific antibodies, of which ELISA is considered the most advantageous for epidemiological investigations, as it offers greater sensitivity and objectivity and can be easily adapted to test large numbers of serum samples (3,4,6,7,8,11,20,21,27,31,35,37). Furthermore, this format is amenable to the use of recombinant antigens, which makes it independent of the necessity to produce large amounts of parasites in vivo or in vitro, facilitates standardization, and has the potential to overcome limitations caused by cross-reactivity (22,32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other serological methods that have been developed and utilized in the past include an IIF assay (6) and a number of ELISAs (1,3,12,13,17). Although these assays allow the detection of infected cattle, they all have limitations to some degree in specificity, sensitivity, reliability, or, in the case of IIF, subjective interpretation and low throughput.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%