2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an ear-attached accelerometer for detecting estrus events in indoor housed dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Shahriar et al (2016) , investigated the use of an accelerometer data collar to detect heat events in pastured dairy cows, and was able to achieve an overall accuracy of 82100%. In a similar study using an ear-tag based sensor, Schweinzer et al (2019) reported an estrus detection accuracy of 96%. Based on these previous studies, coupling appropriate analytics with the data obtained from the sensors described herein may facilitate detection of time-sensitive management challenges such as estrus behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, Shahriar et al (2016) , investigated the use of an accelerometer data collar to detect heat events in pastured dairy cows, and was able to achieve an overall accuracy of 82100%. In a similar study using an ear-tag based sensor, Schweinzer et al (2019) reported an estrus detection accuracy of 96%. Based on these previous studies, coupling appropriate analytics with the data obtained from the sensors described herein may facilitate detection of time-sensitive management challenges such as estrus behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, we used the Smartbow system (SB; Smartbow GmbH), which consists of an accelerometer (3-dimensional) and location (2-dimensional) sensor fixed in an ear tag. Previous studies have evaluated the capabilities of the system to detect rumination (Reiter et al, 2018), predict calving (Krieger et al, 2017), detect estrus (Schweinzer et al, 2019), and monitor drinking events in calves (Roland et al, 2018). Additional studies have evaluated the location feature by focusing on the system's distance (in meters) accuracy in a cow barn (Wolfger et al, 2017), for dairy cows on pasture (Byrne et al, 2019), and for pigs maintained in a gestation stall (Will et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cow sensor data were collected via SMARTBOW (Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) ear-tag accelerometers fitted to individual animals. This system utilizes proprietary algorithms to generate location and behavior measures that have been described and validated previously [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Behavioral data included rumination time, lying time, and activity categorized as inactive, active, and highly active.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%