2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4789239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an automatic system for detection and positioning of small pore defects using digital radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CNR is approximately around 2. The setup geometry as indicated in Figures 1 and 5 is derived using the same procedure, settings, and calibration sample as in [33]. In short, a block of plastic with five ball-bearing steel balls (diameter 0.5 mm) cast inside at different depths and y-z positions is measured with a CT metrology system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CNR is approximately around 2. The setup geometry as indicated in Figures 1 and 5 is derived using the same procedure, settings, and calibration sample as in [33]. In short, a block of plastic with five ball-bearing steel balls (diameter 0.5 mm) cast inside at different depths and y-z positions is measured with a CT metrology system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the DR case, the points consisted of 0.5-mm high-tolerance ball-bearing steel balls, which the algorithm was set up to detect and position. The algorithm parameter values were the same as the for the calibration procedure described in [33] Volume Graphics. Additionally, the diameter and 3-D position of each detected pore are also measured manually in the visualization program.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different images were analyzed to extract the necessary geometrical information for 3D reconstruction. A detailed description of the experimental setup and similar techniques for reconstruction are reported elsewhere [3]. Thereafter the rail head was cut at known positions along the rail, perpendicular to the rail centerline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%