2012
DOI: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.4.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using a computer-aided diagnosis system

Abstract: PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the trabecular bone changes after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients using a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system.Materials and MethodsThe occlusal radiographs taken from 50 UCLP patients were surveyed retrospectively. The images were categorized as: 50 images in group 0 (before bone grafting), 33 images in group 1 (one month after bone grafting), 24 images in group 2 (2-4 months after bone grafting), 15 images in group 3 (5-7 months a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, analyzing palatal morphology before, during, and at the end of the treatment becomes essential for a good clinical prognosis. Traditionally, palatal skeletal structures have been analyzed by two-dimensional (2D) methods, such as periapical, occlusal, and panoramic radiographs [7][8][9], omitting information about the volume of the alveolar bone defects. Indeed, a pre-surgical volume estimation can be useful to determine the anatomical boundaries of the alveolar bone defect; subsequently, volume assessments can appreciate the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting [7,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, analyzing palatal morphology before, during, and at the end of the treatment becomes essential for a good clinical prognosis. Traditionally, palatal skeletal structures have been analyzed by two-dimensional (2D) methods, such as periapical, occlusal, and panoramic radiographs [7][8][9], omitting information about the volume of the alveolar bone defects. Indeed, a pre-surgical volume estimation can be useful to determine the anatomical boundaries of the alveolar bone defect; subsequently, volume assessments can appreciate the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting [7,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%