2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of alternating consecutive maximum contractions as an alternative test of neuromuscular function

Abstract: The standard strength test (SST) has been based only on sustained maximum forces, as well as on relatively large number trials needed to record the maximum forces (F) and their rate of development (RFD). The aim of this study was to extend our recent research on alternating consecutive maximum contractions (ACMC) performed by antagonist muscles. Instead of varying the frequency, we explored the properties of ACMC performed at the self-selected frequency and compared it with SST. Knee extensors and flexors were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted the sample size estimate based on the external and concurrent validity of ACMC observed in previous studies (11,12). According to standard guidelines (13) with power of 0.8 and an alpha level of 0.05, the sample sizes were 22 (11) and 14 (12) for external validity, and between 3 and 17 for the concurrent validity (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We conducted the sample size estimate based on the external and concurrent validity of ACMC observed in previous studies (11,12). According to standard guidelines (13) with power of 0.8 and an alpha level of 0.05, the sample sizes were 22 (11) and 14 (12) for external validity, and between 3 and 17 for the concurrent validity (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to standard guidelines (13) with power of 0.8 and an alpha level of 0.05, the sample sizes were 22 (11) and 14 (12) for external validity, and between 3 and 17 for the concurrent validity (12). Therefore, we conservatively tested sixteen female (age 23.5 ± 3.5 years; body mass 53.7 ± 7.0 kg; height 162.4 ± 5.5 cm; BMI 21.7 ± 2.3) and 13 male (24.8 ± 2.9 years; 79.2 ± 9.7 kg; 180.5 ± 5.8 cm; BMI 24.3 ± 1.9) college students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations