2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of alkanolamine solutions for carbon dioxide removal in cross-flow rotating packed beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was clear that PZ/MEA performed better than MEA and AMP/MEA in the terms of removal efficiency of CO 2 . This characteristic confirmed our previous results (Lin et al, 2010b), presenting that PZ/MEA was suggested to use in a cross-flow RPB for removing CO 2 from a gas stream.…”
Section: Effect Of Liquid Flow Ratesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was clear that PZ/MEA performed better than MEA and AMP/MEA in the terms of removal efficiency of CO 2 . This characteristic confirmed our previous results (Lin et al, 2010b), presenting that PZ/MEA was suggested to use in a cross-flow RPB for removing CO 2 from a gas stream.…”
Section: Effect Of Liquid Flow Ratesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Their experimental results confirmed that the mass transfer efficiency of a cross-flow RPB was higher than that of a countercurrent-flow RPB. Furthermore, Lin et al (2010b) proposed a formulation of the alkanolamine solutions to remove CO 2 from a gas stream containing 10 vol% CO 2 in a cross-flow RPB. They concluded that alkanolamines having high reaction rates with CO 2 were suggested to be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the RPB increased the area of contact between gas and liquid and reduced the total resistance to mass transfer, considerably reducing the size of the equipment and the capital and operating costs [10]. The RPB has been extensively utilized for distillation [11][12][13], VOCs absorption [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], CO 2 absorption [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], O 3 absorption [30][31][32], ozonation [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], reactive precipitation [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], and stripping [53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several technological issues should be critically addressed in using alkanolamine aqueous solutions as absorbents: (1) absorber volume, (2) equipment corrosion, and (2) energy consumption in regeneration. To enhance the mass transfer between gaseous CO 2 and solution, an innovative modification of the absorption process has been proposed, for instance, a rotating packed bed (Tan and Chen, 2006;Lin et al, 2010). Besides that, various absorbent genomes have been proposed and evaluated to obtain high capture efficiency and low regeneration energy, such as using piperazine with diethylenetriamine (Yu et al, 2014), piperazine with diethylene glycol (Yu et al, 2013), and NaOH solution (Lin and Chu, 2015).…”
Section: Capturementioning
confidence: 99%